- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Etienne Owners, how do we feel about Tank Bigsby
Posted on 9/9/24 at 8:54 am
Posted on 9/9/24 at 8:54 am
He looked pretty damn good yesterday. I've got the top waiver in my league and don't want to use it to handcuff. But I'm light at RB and think I might have to.
6
Posted on 9/9/24 at 9:23 am to High Life
Didn't get to watch game. Just curious how many carries Tank got before/after the ETN fumble at goal line? Who else is available on waivers at RB in your league? I hope it doesn't turn into a timeshare as ETN owner, but Tank is a good RB and you assure yourself of that backfield with burning the waiver.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 9:48 am to EagleEye99
quote:
Just curious how many carries Tank got before/after the ETN fumble at goal line?
Not sure. Etienne is known for his ball security so I doubt the coaching staff would limit him to make some kind of point.
quote:
I hope it doesn't turn into a timeshare as ETN owner, but Tank is a good RB and you assure yourself of that backfield with burning the waiver.
This is my fear. Etienne is definitely the 1a, and I don't see that changing, but it seems they want to carve out and early down role for Tank. I'm not sure if I want to waste a top waiver on him.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 11:25 am to High Life
Not good.
I feel like Tank showed enough to get more carries. Not really worried about Etienne's fumble though.
I feel like Tank showed enough to get more carries. Not really worried about Etienne's fumble though.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:20 pm to High Life
You should have already rostered Bigsby if you have Etienne.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:49 pm to High Life
They’ve wanted to get him involved for 2 years now. They have repeatedly said they want to give Etienne some help. If Bigsby is playing well by all indications from the team he’s going to share the load to an extent. No idea if that’s 30 or 50% but he looked very decisive with nice burst yesterday.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 1:34 pm to High Life
quote:
He looked pretty damn good yesterday. I've got the top waiver in my league and don't want to use it to handcuff. But I'm light at RB and think I might have to.
In your situation, not knowing who is on your waiver wire, but assuming the typical available players in a 12 team league, I would probably only have Isaiah Likely over him (if he's even available in your league).
Posted on 9/9/24 at 2:03 pm to High Life
quote:
He looked pretty damn good yesterday. I've got the top waiver in my league and don't want to use it to handcuff. But I'm light at RB and think I might have to.
Think of it like this
- If Etienne plays the whole season, is Tank Bigsby ever going to crack your lineup?
- If Etienne were to get hurt, would Tank Bigsby be an auto start over anyone else you have on your roster for that spot or available on waivers?
If the answer to both of those is yes, it’s a great move
If the answer to 1 is no and 2 is yes…. I think it’s a bad move, why burn top waiver assuming your guy gets hurt instead of waiting for the inevitable great RB to become available on waivers
If the answer to both questions is no, then I’m assuming you wouldn’t have made the thread
This post was edited on 9/9/24 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 9/9/24 at 2:50 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
You should have already rostered Bigsby if you have Etienne.
Lol he’s only rostered in 5% of leagues.. Nice try Capt. Hindsight.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 3:12 pm to Tiger1242
quote:
Etienne plays the whole season, is Tank Bigsby ever going to crack your lineup?
Probably not
quote:
If Etienne were to get hurt, would Tank Bigsby be an auto start over anyone else you have on your roster for that spot or available on waivers?
Yes 100%.
quote:
If the answer to 1 is no and 2 is yes…. I think it’s a bad move, why burn top waiver assuming your guy gets hurt instead of waiting for the inevitable great RB to become available on waivers
I’m looking at all the rosters and timeshares and Tank actually seems like a starter caliber. I’m usually not a fan of handcuffing but I can’t afford to lose Etienne. If I thought Tank was a jag I wouldn’t care.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News