
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anybody else need Christine Michael to go forward?
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:25 am to GynoSandberg
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:25 am to GynoSandberg
Yea I think Procisse will be flexible in good matchups moving forward, especially in PPR. Michael still looks to be the goal line and primary ball carrier, while a more efficient Russ and Seattle O should equal more TDs for him.
It's easy for some people to fall back on "well he splits carries" without realizing that like 80% of NFL backfields are absolutely fricked from a distribution standpoint. Definitely tempering expectations, but I think it would be a mistake to sell Michael now for pennies.
It's easy for some people to fall back on "well he splits carries" without realizing that like 80% of NFL backfields are absolutely fricked from a distribution standpoint. Definitely tempering expectations, but I think it would be a mistake to sell Michael now for pennies.
Posted on 11/8/16 at 10:23 am to DallasTiger45
So, I have 6 RBs on my roster with D. Lewis in IR slot. We can only carry 5 active RBs and I'm going to have to drop another rb in week 11 when broncos def and Matt Bryant go on bye. I'm not dropping either of those. I have Bell, D. Williams, D. Lewis, Kelley, Michael and Starks. Have to drop 2 of these. Michael and Williams in hopes that Bell doesn't get hurt and I pick him back up after week 11? .5 ppr.

Popular
Back to top

1








