Started By
Message
locked post

What has caused more of an economic problem for LA?

Posted on 8/2/10 at 12:27 pm
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22369 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 12:27 pm
-The actual Horizon Oil Spill Incident

OR

-The media's Gloom and Doom coverage of the Oil Spill (The media jumping to conclusions on several crucial pieces of the incident)
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19583 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 12:43 pm to
Media and Government by far
Posted by DaphneTigah
Flying under the radar.
Member since Dec 2007
4977 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Media and Government by far



Obama called, he has requested to change the subject.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58108 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 1:02 pm to
I don't think as a whole the LA economy has been hurt real badly by the media being dumbasses. That seems to be a much bigger issue for Alabama and Florida.

The La economy is hurt worse by the spill itself and probably even more by the moratorium.
Posted by guedeaux
Tardis
Member since Jan 2008
13609 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

I don't think as a whole the LA economy has been hurt real badly by the media being dumbasses.


yeah, the oil in the water necessitating the closure of fishing waters has done the most economic damage prior to the retarded moratorium by the gubment.

Alabama and Florida definitely got hurt by the media, but I think the amount of oil that washed up on shore did a crapton on its own to repel vacationers (although if there were no media, no one would've known how much or how little oil was on the beaches)
Posted by Frankie Knuckles
Member since Jul 2010
2807 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 1:26 pm to
Obama is going to inflict more harm than the spill imo.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22369 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

yeah, the oil in the water necessitating the closure of fishing waters has done the most economic damage


I have a feeling that when it is all said and done the fisherman etc.. affected will actually come out ahead $$ wise bc it is becoming more and more likely that the spill will NOT cause any long term ecological damage and the BP $$ should be more than fair.
This post was edited on 8/2/10 at 1:34 pm
Posted by DaphneTigah
Flying under the radar.
Member since Dec 2007
4977 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

I have a feeling that when it is all said and done the fisherman etc.. affected will actually come out ahead $$ wise bc it is becoming more and more likely that the spill will NOT cause any long term ecological damage.



I have a feeling that you don't have a link to back up that feeling?? Who the frick knows?? Only time will tell. Scientists will study and the data will tell the tale over time.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22369 posts
Posted on 8/2/10 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

I have a feeling that you don't have a link to back up that feeling??


Dude there is LOTS of early data stating that this spill will not have much of a long term ecological impacts.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram