- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/1/23 at 10:23 pm to TideHater
Just purchased 10 of them now frick right off ATF
Posted on 6/2/23 at 8:35 am to Don Quixote
Absolutely !! And if folks knew you could tax stamp and make better and quieter suppressors at home with basic equipment the silencer shop, etc would go out of business.
Posted on 6/2/23 at 8:35 am to MasterDigger
quote:
The injunction applies to all members of GOA and individuals employed directly by the State of Texas or its agencies.
Looks like you still need to join a group or get a job with the state of texas.
Posted on 6/2/23 at 9:38 am to bbvdd
quote:
Member of the FPC.
I’m good.
quote:
bbvdd
Alabama Fan
Memphis, TN
5th District only, homeboy.
Posted on 6/2/23 at 10:58 am to finchmeister08
The FPC lawsuit is federal in the 5th circuit therefore covers all FPC members
Mock v Garland
ETA:
LINK
Tried copying the wording but it won’t let me.
Mock v Garland
ETA:
LINK
Tried copying the wording but it won’t let me.
This post was edited on 6/2/23 at 11:04 am
Posted on 6/2/23 at 11:12 am to TideHater
Never had them, my teeth are straight and perfect
Posted on 6/2/23 at 11:28 am to bbvdd
quote:I copy/pasted the relevant part.
The FPC lawsuit is federal in the 5th circuit therefore covers all FPC members
Mock v Garland
ETA:
LINK
Tried copying the wording but it won’t let me.
quote:
William T. Mock; Christopher Lewis; Firearms Policy
Coalition, Incorporated, a nonprofit corporation; Maxim
Defense Industries, L.L.C.,
Plaintiffs—Appellants,
quote:If you read it, there are several key points in there;
Instead, Plaintiffs merely
request clarification on whether their reading of the term ‘Plaintiffs’ to
include the customers and members whose interests Plaintiffs Maxim
Defense and Firearms Policy Coalition (‘FPC’) have represented since day
one of this litigation is correct.”
That reading is correct. Also as requested, the term “Plaintiffs in this
case” includes the individual plaintiffs’ resident family members.
Any relief beyond what is explicitly requested, which arguably would
be tantamount to a nationwide injunction, is DENIED
Member of FPC since day 1 of this litigation... the day the lawsuit was filed. I know FPC was back-dating stuff, so if you joined up until May 31 they'd say you were a member... I wouldn't trust that. It would be profoundly easy to for the government to determine when you paid your dues, and catch you on that falsehood.
They also explicitly state they are NOT issuing a nationwide injunction.
On Armed Attorneys, one of the lawyers said she reads this as having to be in the 5th Circuit area to apply.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News