- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Groomers are winning, woman claims to be “transcanine” to rationalize beastia…
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:08 am to Between TheHedges
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:08 am to Between TheHedges
Her brains all knotted up.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 11:29 pm to Powerman
quote:
So getting fired from your job and kicked off of only fans is proof to you that they're winning? Doesn't sound like winning to me
You’re missing the point of my statement
She is not winning herself, the Groomer Agenda is winning because more and more weirdos are empowered to share their mental illness in public
Posted on 1/30/23 at 7:13 am to Between TheHedges
Isn't this animal abuse ?
Posted on 1/30/23 at 7:18 am to Between TheHedges
Ewww! Lock that crazy ho up for animal abuse.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 7:42 am to Tiger Prawn
quote:
So she likes it doggy style?
She likes it ruff too.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 7:54 am to Between TheHedges
I’m seeing more and more pet owners that I wonder if they have headed down this path.
The affection I see people show some animals crosses a line for me.
Letting dogs tongue their mouths?
Stimulating the dog’s nipples (aka “rubbing the belly”) and below?
With humans, when we stimulate the pink parts we call that getting on base (1st through 3rd for you autists).
Why does it seem like so many pet owners seem to make a display of getting on base with their dogs? You sick fricks aren’t too far from this nasty bitch.
Look where it got Rex (may he rest in peace).
The affection I see people show some animals crosses a line for me.
Letting dogs tongue their mouths?
Stimulating the dog’s nipples (aka “rubbing the belly”) and below?
With humans, when we stimulate the pink parts we call that getting on base (1st through 3rd for you autists).
Why does it seem like so many pet owners seem to make a display of getting on base with their dogs? You sick fricks aren’t too far from this nasty bitch.
Look where it got Rex (may he rest in peace).
Posted on 1/30/23 at 8:36 am to Between TheHedges
The heart wants what the heart wants. Sigh.
Given that this woman had been with 6 dogs prior to coming out is it likely that number will increase now that she has? How does that work? Is it likely to increase the % of people bent that way or do they exist and we are just unaware? No doubt some folks may be swayed to experiment if the practice were socially acceptable but would more become devotees of the disgusting behavior in numbers which would be a problem? What problem would it represent other than people doing disgusting things, a characteristic of humans that is not limited to beastiality. Folks are weird. They do all manner of sick stuff and most of the impact on society is negligible. The impact of doing them openly on the individual is the only legitimate reaction that society has at its disposal and will continue to play an important role in maintaining acceptable norms. Always has, always will....
Given that this woman had been with 6 dogs prior to coming out is it likely that number will increase now that she has? How does that work? Is it likely to increase the % of people bent that way or do they exist and we are just unaware? No doubt some folks may be swayed to experiment if the practice were socially acceptable but would more become devotees of the disgusting behavior in numbers which would be a problem? What problem would it represent other than people doing disgusting things, a characteristic of humans that is not limited to beastiality. Folks are weird. They do all manner of sick stuff and most of the impact on society is negligible. The impact of doing them openly on the individual is the only legitimate reaction that society has at its disposal and will continue to play an important role in maintaining acceptable norms. Always has, always will....
Posted on 1/30/23 at 8:39 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
How to capitalize on social media 101.
ALL publicity is good publicity. Short of legal issues arising this idiot has probably already capitalized on this publicity and if not will. It may be nothing more than outraging folks that drive people to act in such a way, who knows. All we know for certain is that man is indeed a piece of work....
Posted on 1/30/23 at 8:40 am to Jack Carter
quote:She is a dog bruh, this is an animal control issue.
Admitting to bestiality. Has she been arrested yet?
Posted on 1/30/23 at 8:44 am to FearlessFreep
quote:
is it remotely possible that this chick is just trolling?
i mean, is there any evidence besides her word that she’s been carnal with canines?
Going down that rabbit hole would negate some of the outrage that so many people thrive on. It has always been part of human nature to expect the worst of people while questioning whatever good things we witness people doing. The outrage is a big part of the thrill no doubt.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 8:50 am to SantaFe
quote:
Isn't this animal abuse ?
No doubt from a legal standpoint but if the dog is her property she should be free to do anything she chooses with her property as long as no other people are impacted beyond disgust. She is treating those dogs better than most cows and chickens are treated by their owners. If animals could litigate these things themselves its a safe bet that Rover's mistreatment would be handled somewhere down the road when cows and chickens ain't knocked in the head and consumed....waaaaaaayyyyyy down the road. It is disgusting but if it is her property what function does the state have in legislating her use of said property? Outside of it impacting other people I don't see one. Michael Vick was famously taken to task for mistreating animals but was it a proper function of the state? I don't like dog fighting but it ought not be illegal because I don't like it...I don't like collard greens but they are legal.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 8:55 am to Between TheHedges
quote:
You’re missing the point of my statement
She is not winning herself, the Groomer Agenda is winning because more and more weirdos are empowered to share their mental illness in public
How is that winning? Is it making it more socially acceptable? If so, where is the problem? Presumably these people exist. Is it not better to know your neighbor is buggering Rover than assuming he isn't when he is??? I would posit that it won't make it more socially acceptable because its disgusting and viewed that way by most folks regardless of laws or knowledge. It could induce some folks into experimentation, no doubt, but again, will they become devotees of the practice and if they do what harm is done? It is disgusting without question but many things in life are disgusting and we plod through life as best we can. There is no more cleansing agent known to man than the light of knowledge which eliminates ignorance. Far better for these sick people to be known than unknown....
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News