Started By
Message

re: Dave Aranda would win a NC within 3 years

Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:03 pm to
Posted by BayouCatFan
Member since Jul 2008
4580 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:03 pm to
If Aranda didnt have history at LSU he wouldnt even be in consideration. Therefore, he shouldnt be in contention now because nepotism hires almost always turn out bad.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32065 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Aranda didnt have history at LSU he wouldnt even be in consideration. Therefore, he shouldnt be in contention now because nepotism hires almost always turn out bad.





Aranda has been known as a defensive guru at multiple stops in multiple conferences for a long time. He now has Baylor 6-1 he would be on anyone’s list.
Posted by BayouCowboy
Member since Dec 2012
14480 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

If Aranda didnt have history at LSU he wouldnt even be in consideration. Therefore, he shouldnt be in contention now because nepotism hires almost always turn out bad.

Aranda was also elevated to AHC at LSU and even though that may not always mean much (title only), knowing who the HC was I would expect Dave to have a bigger impact.
Posted by Manswers
Michigan
Member since Feb 2009
3619 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

nepotism hires almost always turn out bad.



Hiring Aranda would not be nepotism. He's not related to Woodward or anyone in the AD office, to my knowledge.

It's a positive that people know him.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram