Started By
Message

re: At full strength who was more powerful in ww2 Germany or US?

Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:59 pm to
Posted by Big Gorilla
Bossier City
Member since Oct 2020
5486 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:59 pm to
They weren't "stronger" then most, but their tank generals shocked the French and the eastern Europeans with Blitzkrieg. Before then, the world never saw attacks move that quickly.

If Germany doesn't attack Russia then yes, they would have owned all of western Europe before we even joined the war.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
9842 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 4:40 pm to
Germany was actually weaker than France on paper. The problem was France's entire defense plan was a WWI type stalemate. They could have easily stopped the blitz but the top French generals were phucking stupid and didn't move reserves in time, even held up reinforcements due change in top generals when hours mattered. The bravery of their soldiers was something of wonder, many units fought to the last man. Entire divisions were sent south when they could have been used to stop Germany cold in Belgium
Posted by tigercross
Member since Feb 2008
4918 posts
Posted on 11/2/21 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

If Germany doesn't attack Russia then yes, they would have owned all of western Europe before we even joined the war.


Did they not? The Axis controlled pretty much everything in western Europe besides the south of France by the end of June 1940. We didn't enter for another 18 months.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram