- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Recordings Reveal Lockstep COVID-19 Protocols, Patient Isolation by Hospitals
Posted on 10/31/21 at 7:33 pm to DaleDenton
Posted on 10/31/21 at 7:33 pm to DaleDenton
quote:Pretty sure on here I saw it's a 99.7% survival. Sounds like it ought to be around 50%.
Every hospital is owned by a corporation that is profit driven.
They get paid to administer remedisver.
They get paid to have patients on the vent.
They offer no therapy or treatments beforehand as they do not pay.
Test positive, go home and wait for your lips to turn blue, then go to the hospital to be put on a vent. The hospital profits, the doctors are following the guidelines, everyone wins but the patient.
2
Posted on 10/31/21 at 7:35 pm to Diamondawg
No one cares about the survivors or failure of the science, they must get the jab to protect others.
The shot is free of course, everyone's tax dollars is paying for it.
The shot is free of course, everyone's tax dollars is paying for it.
This post was edited on 10/31/21 at 7:36 pm
Posted on 10/31/21 at 8:28 pm to Diamondawg
quote:Wrong. There are plenty of public hospitals.
Every hospital is owned by a corporation that is profit driven.
quote:Doubt it, but OK.
They get paid to administer remedisver.
quote:As they should. Most hospitals lose money on ventilator patients depending on their patient mix. Early going, hospitals and critical care doctors were doing what had been established protocols for years. Covid and the lungs were a different animal. They figured out that ventilators were causing baro-trauma so they switched to CPAP and BiPAP. You commit a patient to a ventilator and your labor resources increase immensely. Plus, with everyone on ventilators your overtime costs are through the roof because and the additional resources.
They get paid to have patients on the vent.
So what if non invasive BiPAP or CPAP don't work? Do you let the patient die with crossed blood gases or do you move on to the next therapy that is more support, i.e., intubation and mechanical ventilation? You would lose your arse in a lawsuit if you withheld the only possible solution for that patient by not intubating without the family's refusal.
Are there isolated cases like those cited? Probably! Is it widespread? I still say horseshite!
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News