- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PCR test gives false positives from colds and other viruses now confirmed.
Posted on 10/26/21 at 9:44 pm to mjthe
Posted on 10/26/21 at 9:44 pm to mjthe
This is why there will be a new test coming out at the end of December that will differentiate covid from the flue. When this new test comes out watch what the covid numbers do and the flue (which disappeared) numbers will increase.
Posted on 10/26/21 at 9:44 pm to interdesting
I thought I read that the test CAN differentiate between natural immunity and vaccine “immunity”. ???
Posted on 10/26/21 at 10:54 pm to Wasting Time
Bump because this deserves it.
Posted on 10/26/21 at 11:10 pm to Crimson K
So…..the positivity rate? The surge? All of it? Total BS?
And the mask mandates, etc? All based on a sham inflated case count.
All these people pushing this science are plain awful.
And the mask mandates, etc? All based on a sham inflated case count.
All these people pushing this science are plain awful.
Posted on 10/27/21 at 12:55 am to Crimson K
Fake news that has been debunked countless times. Stop listening to random bloggers who are not doctors and have no clue what they're talking about. Real doctors were asked about this and here's what they said:
These Covid conspiracy theories are so bizarre to me.
quote:
However, Dr Thushan de Silva, from the University of Sheffield’s Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, has previously told Reuters that this is not correct.
He explained that the document is outlining a “very common process” that is used to determine the lowest amount of viral genetic material the PCR tests could detect. To calculate this limit, he said:“You need to have a known quantity of virus to extract genetic material (RNA) from, or alternatively a known quantity of RNA identical to that carried by the virus”. In this case, the identical RNA that the CDC used was ‘transcribed’ RNA. This is synthetically produced genetic material which is identical to that carried by the virus, and, according to Dr Stephen Griffin, a virologist and Associate Professor at Leeds Institute of Medical Research, means that scientists already know how much genetic material is present in the sample.
quote:
He explained “you can't make it quantitative with a virus stock that's not been characterised. So you start with an in vitro [in the lab] transcribed RNA, it’s much better, it's easier to do that."
quote:
Dr De Silva told Reuters: “There are now hundreds of stocks of cultured SARS-CoV-2 in laboratories around the world”.
Dr Griffin previously told Full Fact: “SARS-CoV2 has been sampled millions of times over from infected people, including those originally found to be infected in China,”.
These Covid conspiracy theories are so bizarre to me.
Posted on 10/27/21 at 1:08 am to tiger91
LINK
LINK
My reading (and I may be wrong bc there is plenty of double-talk and innuendo) is that the tests cannot fell difference or effectiveness of antibodies from infection v. Vaccine. Initially, the tests only measured antibodies from infection, bc vaccines were not available initially. But, once available, the testing is nly detects the presence of absence of antibodies (proteins) from vaccine and infection (first bullet point under first heading).
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News