- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
5
Posted on 10/24/21 at 9:02 am to boosiebadazz
Well she obviously doesn’t know the law, so, what does she base her rulings on? “Muh feels”?
Posted on 10/24/21 at 9:04 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
More shocking is admitting to not knowing the Erie doctrine
That was painful to watch.
Posted on 10/24/21 at 9:06 am to boosiebadazz
She's sure she read about it , back in school.
That should be enough, right?
That should be enough, right?
Posted on 10/24/21 at 10:16 am to boosiebadazz
That’s base level Fed Courts bar exam material
Embarrassing
Embarrassing
Posted on 10/24/21 at 12:24 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
More shocking is admitting to not knowing the Erie doctrine.
I've never stood within 1000 yards of a law class and could have given a reasonably cogent answer on the Erie doctrine. And that's entirely because I'm very interested in not just politics but more generally, how our nation operates. I find it personally interesting.
How in the frick is it even possible one could have a career in law such as hers and plead total ignorance?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News