Started By
Message

re: So where is the OSHA mandate?

Posted on 10/5/21 at 4:34 pm to
Posted by Mac Power
Member since Jul 2019
435 posts
Posted on 10/5/21 at 4:34 pm to
I agree it's some seriously faulty logic.

They can't say two products are "legally distinct", but the same. Mandate I get it, but dont allow me to get the one legally approved.

Pfizer wants to play marketing and legal games during a pandemic, and then complain when they get called on it. Gtfoh
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
27186 posts
Posted on 10/5/21 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

They can't say two products are "legally distinct", but the same.


Cmon baw. That happens ALL the time across all industries, particularly pharma.

quote:

Pfizer wants to play marketing and legal games during a pandemic, and then complain when they get called on it.


They gave their product a name What legal advantage do you guys think Pfizer is obtaining by this “shadiness”? That’s what I don’t see here.

You guys are implying some level of malevolence and/or legal opportunism by Pfizer, but I don’t even understand what that would be?

I mean, if yalls point is that the *actually* approved vaccine is not generally available, then you’re correct. But it’s just a technicality, and a temporary one at that.
This post was edited on 10/5/21 at 4:42 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram