re: So where is the OSHA mandate?

quote:

---

But when the rubber hits the road the doctor is still required to tell their patients that the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine is not an FDA-approved vaccine:

---

Of course they are….it isn’t. Only the Comirnaty branded version is. But I don’t know why you think that’s so significant or surprising. They have been required to do that the whole time, same with Moderna and JNJ. As I understand, that’s part of the EUA framework. Blame lawyers for disclaimers like that I guess.

quote:

---

On one had you have the FDA saying the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine is not an FDA-approved vaccine, your doctor is required to communicate that information to you and then we have people in the MSM and the White House saying the "vaccine" (purposely not being specific) is fully approved.

---

Doctors and pharmacists make the same pronouncements when they are giving you generic versions of drugs all the time.

Again, my man, I really, really think you are trying too hard to read something into this situation that isn’t there. What is it that you think is the end to all of this, if tomfoolery is afoot? It’s not like Pfizer gets preferential legal treatment on one hand and not the other. They’re immune regardless, and there are injury compensation programs in both instances.

quote:

---

The logic to go from "not and FDA-approved vaccine" to fully approved rivels string theory in terms of logic.

---

The political messaging—I agree. All they needed to do was explain the name difference. Like I said, blame lawyers and government bureaucracy foe the confusion and needless nuance.

But in a practical sense, it’s really a nothingburger.