re: What the CA election shows us about Democrats

quote:

---

Here is one problem I found with your theorem.

*All* Dems are purely that - Dems
*not all* GOPers are purely GOP

So if we were busy putting someone in office only due to the -R after their name, we’d be in the same position as we are now with far less integrity.

---

If we were busy putting people in office only due to the -R after their last name... John Bel Edwards would have spent the last 6 (or 2) years as a plaintiff's attorney.

And whatever you feel about David Vitter or Eddie Rispone, and whatever integrity or lack thereof they have, they would have been far better for LA than JBE.

So, we would be in a far better position... not the same one. Maybe it would be less pure... but again... slightly pure GOP is better than wholly pure Dem.