Started By
Message

re: 9/11 Documentary. More questions than answers.

Posted on 9/14/21 at 10:39 am to
Posted by Craig86
Florida
Member since Oct 2012
1602 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 10:39 am to
If you care to look, you can find many pictures of WTC7 with extensive damage right before it fell. Most of the people saying that nothing hit it, don’t know what they’re talking about.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111288 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 10:45 am to
quote:

If you care to look, you can find many pictures of WTC7 with extensive damage right before it fell. Most of the people saying that nothing hit it, don’t know what they’re talking about.



Hard to believe it would NOT have had extensive damage:

Posted by LittleRockDoc
Member since Mar 2019
183 posts
Posted on 9/14/21 at 11:25 am to
The official explanation for the collapse from NIST was due to fires and not damage from the buildings. In fact the other surrounding buildings were much more heavily damaged and did not fall.

I don't claim to have an all encompassing theory but the things stood out to me were:

1 These were amateur pilots who would not have the skill to fly these planes at low altitude at 500 mph

2 There were explosions seen and heard below the area of impact prior to collapse. Plus the jet fuel would burn out quickly and would not come close to melting the steel.

3 The fires burned for 3 months afterwards with some reaching nearly 3000 degrees. Thermite was found as well.

4. I agree WTC 7 is the smoking gun. No steel building before or since has ever collapsed due to fire.

Just watch the documentary and draw your own conclusions. Can't tie it all in but something fricky happened
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram