- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anyone get the first vaccine dose and decide not to get the second?
Posted on 9/10/21 at 10:09 am to lsunurse
Posted on 9/10/21 at 10:09 am to lsunurse
quote:
I know this
You know this
I'm a person that doesn't believe the vaccine will kill you and doesn't believe vaccine side effects are worse than COVID. I had COVID and it sucks for some people....some have better reactions.
What I want to know is how a vaccine got EUA by the FDA largely because of an efficacy of preventing disease at or around a 95% clip. However, now we are seeing that efficacy is approaching closer to 50%. The FDA has mentioned nothing about this....they haven't updated their efficacy numbers to reflect that. They were fricking wrong and they aren't taking any responsibility for it. That's where my concern lays. On top of that the FDA fully approved Pfizer even though the efficacy had dropped severely based on real world use....how is that possible? The scientific data got worse for the vaccine yet it still get fully approved. That tells me something fricky is going on in the background that us lay people aren't being told.
Posted on 9/10/21 at 12:35 pm to LSU316
quote:
What I want to know is how a vaccine got EUA by the FDA largely because of an efficacy of preventing disease at or around a 95% clip. However, now we are seeing that efficacy is approaching closer to 50%. The FDA has mentioned nothing about this....they haven't updated their efficacy numbers to reflect that. They were fricking wrong and they aren't taking any responsibility for it. That's where my concern lays. On top of that the FDA fully approved Pfizer even though the efficacy had dropped severely based on real world use....how is that possible? The scientific data got worse for the vaccine yet it still get fully approved. That tells me something fricky is going on in the background that us lay people aren't being told.
When you don't understand what those percentages are referring to of course you'd come to incorrect conclusion regarding vaccine efficacy.
Posted on 9/10/21 at 1:16 pm to LSU316
quote:
However, now we are seeing that efficacy is approaching closer to 50%.
Where are “we” seeing this?
Posted on 9/10/21 at 1:22 pm to LSU316
quote:
However, now we are seeing that efficacy is approaching closer to 50%. The FDA has mentioned nothing about this....they haven't updated their efficacy numbers to reflect that.
Because it's not even close to being true?
Where the frick do y'all get this bad info from?
Posted on 9/10/21 at 3:03 pm to LSU316
quote:
What I want to know is how a vaccine got EUA by the FDA largely because of an efficacy of preventing disease at or around a 95% clip. However, now we are seeing that efficacy is approaching closer to 50%.
The virus mutated. Have you not been watching all the news regarding the delta variant?
I'm being serious btw. I keep seeing this come up in threads.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)