- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/9/21 at 7:53 am to udtiger
quote:
So...it's religious discrimination then.
Anti-vax is a religion now?
Posted on 9/9/21 at 8:33 am to udtiger
quote:
So...it's religious discrimination then.
No
quote:
Then in 1944, in Prince v. Massachusetts, the Court held that states may require vaccination regardless of a parent’s religious objection, stating that, “the right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community or the child to communicable disease or the latter to ill health or death.” This case made it clear that religious exemptions offered by states are elective, rather than mandated by the First Amendment’s right to free exercise of religion.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 8:49 am to udtiger
Remember , if the British had captured Washington or Jefferson they would have swung at the end of a rope from the nearest tree. Those great men took great risk so that we could have Freedom and Liberty.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News