Started By
Message

re: Biden to sign EO

Posted on 9/9/21 at 7:50 am to
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99183 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 7:50 am to
So...it's religious discrimination then.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23834 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 7:53 am to
quote:

So...it's religious discrimination then.

Anti-vax is a religion now?
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
127471 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 8:33 am to
quote:

So...it's religious discrimination then.

No
quote:

Then in 1944, in Prince v. Massachusetts, the Court held that states may require vaccination regardless of a parent’s religious objection, stating that, “the right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community or the child to communicable disease or the latter to ill health or death.” This case made it clear that religious exemptions offered by states are elective, rather than mandated by the First Amendment’s right to free exercise of religion.
Posted by SantaFe
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2019
6607 posts
Posted on 9/9/21 at 8:49 am to
Remember , if the British had captured Washington or Jefferson they would have swung at the end of a rope from the nearest tree. Those great men took great risk so that we could have Freedom and Liberty.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram