- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: US States with Largest City < 100,000 people
Posted on 8/26/21 at 7:41 am to BitBuster
Posted on 8/26/21 at 7:41 am to BitBuster
I don't know if any of these cities qualify, but I feel it's misleading when they give you the "population" of a city but do not give you the population of the "greater" area. You always hear that New Orleans has a population of about 300K. The greater New Orleans area is over 1.2 million. THAT is the real population. The only reason Jefferson, St. Bernard, St. Charles and St. Tammany exists is because they grew around Orleans.
I wonder what the "greater" area of those cities are.
I wonder what the "greater" area of those cities are.
Posted on 8/26/21 at 7:43 am to MMauler
quote:
I wonder what the "greater" area of those cities are.
I've been to four out of five of those cities. The metro pop of those cities isn't much different than the city population.
Can't speak to Wilmington though.
Posted on 8/26/21 at 7:47 am to MMauler
quote:
The only reason Jefferson, St. Bernard, St. Charles and St. Tammany exists is because they grew around Orleans.
I think you meant to say "they fled NO"
Posted on 8/26/21 at 8:28 am to MMauler
quote:
The only reason Jefferson, St. Bernard, St. Charles and St. Tammany exists is because they grew around Orleans.
I mean, would you want to live in NOLA proper? No thanks
Posted on 8/26/21 at 9:03 am to MMauler
quote:I just had this conversation with my fiancée the other day. We were watching the first episode of Hard Knocks, and she wondered how big Pittsburgh was. I looked it up and told her 300,000, and she wondered how they had an NFL team.
the "population" of a city but do not give you the population of the "greater" area.
I gave her a comparison with the first city that came to mind as a potential comp, Milwaukee, which has a pop. of 577,000. The metro areas are 2.3m and 1.5m respectively, so Pitt is actually a larger market.
Populations for city propers can be very misleading.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)