- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Texas A&M is NOT happy about this
Posted on 7/22/21 at 10:04 am to bbap
Posted on 7/22/21 at 10:04 am to bbap
quote:what’s so wrong with pod scheduling? It insures we play every team more often than we do now and likely then we did before the addition of Aggey and great value tigers.
which is just a complete ridiculous idea.
This post was edited on 7/22/21 at 10:05 am
1
Posted on 7/22/21 at 10:17 am to Pedro
quote:
what’s so wrong with pod scheduling? It insures we play every team more often than we do now and likely then we did before the addition of Aggey and great value tigers.
One worry is that you could have 3 teams that are undefeated that haven't played each out. I am actually not sure if that is possible, but let's say it is. What do you do then? I guess you could implement an SEC playoff with the 4 pod winners.
I am still on board with the pod over 8 team divisions. I would love the Pod system now. I can't stand playing at Mizzou, Kentucky, Georgia, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Vandy once every 12 years.
ETA: Although, now that I'm looking at the proposed 14 team pod schedule, it's not really like little divisions. Just because one team is in your pod doesn't mean they play the same teams every year. So, I guess pod champs wouldn't be a thing.
This post was edited on 7/22/21 at 10:20 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News