- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Legal battle over right-to-life of Lafayette man in vegetative state
Posted on 7/28/21 at 2:14 pm to Allluvnohate
Posted on 7/28/21 at 2:14 pm to Allluvnohate
quote:
So you would choose to have the person who you are in the middle of a divorce with making a life or death decision for you? And their incentive to choose death is a million dollar lawsuit.
That should definitely be taken into account in this situation.
No, I wouldn't. I would/do have a living will stating who should be my healthcare proxy. If my choice changes, so will my documents. That isn't what we are discussing here, however. The statement that I disagreed with was that it is bad policy (i.e., default rule) for the spouse to be first in line as a healthcare proxy if one isn't named. Policy shouldn't be written for outlier situations. Regardless of who is the best decision maker in this situation, I think we can say that it is an outlier, and a situation that could be avoided with the execution of a simple document.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News