quote:
He underperformed down-ballot Republicans in the majority of the suburbs, nation-wide, FOR THE SECOND FRICKING STRAIGHT ELECTION. There were over 5.5 million and 5 million voters, in 2016 and 2020 respectively, who voted for at least 1 down-ballot R but didn't vote for Trump for President.

You are an idiot, dude.

Seriously, watch Rich Baris's Inside the Numbers show every Monday, Wednedsay, and Friday. He is a professional pollster unlike you, and has been breaking down Georgia and its voter files for months.

Who gives a shite about the suburbs? It makes up a fraction of the vote. If it were 100% of the vote you'd have a point. But please realize that Trump gained more rural, blue collar, working class, and minority votes than he lost in the suburbs. It's not a zero sum game. If you watched Inside the Numbers, you'd know this.

The voters who are blue collar, working class types will NOT turn out for traditional Republicans. So if you pander to MUH SUBURBS, you will lose the working class vote.

Mitt Romney would have NOT won Ohio in 2020. John McCain would have LOST Ohio in 2020. Trump won it by 10 points. Run a traditional Chamber of Commerce, free trade, tax cuts, wall street Republican and you might win back some of the suburbs, but at the expense of the working class which consists of a much larger share of the electorate.

Going after muh suburbs is a losing strategy, which is why the media focuses on it so much. It's bait.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Toomer Deplorable

Team Bitter Clinger

Member since May 2020

18110 posts

Posted on 7/11/21 at 4:23 pm to goldennugget

quote:
Going after muh suburbs is a losing strategy, which is why the media focuses on it so much. It's bait.

The more affluent the suburb, the more likely it is to be a hotbed of progtardism. I was astounded by the number of “Black Marxist Lives Matter” yard-signs that spring up like mushrooms in the more affluent suburbs immediately surrounding Birmingham last summer. Affluent white women are eager to show they are “good” people and are sufficiently “woke.”

This post was edited on 7/11/21 at 4:24 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by RammerJammer91

Member since Jan 2016

5212 posts

Posted on 7/11/21 at 6:10 pm to goldennugget

quote:
You are an idiot, dude.

Seriously, watch Rich Baris's Inside the Numbers show every Monday, Wednedsay, and Friday. He is a professional pollster unlike you, and has been breaking down Georgia and its voter files for months.

Who gives a shite about the suburbs? It makes up a fraction of the vote. If it were 100% of the vote you'd have a point. But please realize that Trump gained more rural, blue collar, working class, and minority votes than he lost in the suburbs. It's not a zero sum game. If you watched Inside the Numbers, you'd know this.

The voters who are blue collar, working class types will NOT turn out for traditional Republicans. So if you pander to MUH SUBURBS, you will lose the working class vote.

Mitt Romney would have NOT won Ohio in 2020. John McCain would have LOST Ohio in 2020. Trump won it by 10 points. Run a traditional Chamber of Commerce, free trade, tax cuts, wall street Republican and you might win back some of the suburbs, but at the expense of the working class which consists of a much larger share of the electorate.

Going after muh suburbs is a losing strategy, which is why the media focuses on it so much. It's bait.

Nah, idiots are the ones who can't comprehend REAL, CONCRETE numbers and recognize the FACT that Trump underperformed the majority of down-ballot Republicans in the suburbs in 2016 and 2020.

Idiots are also the ones who are still embracing a fricking loser who fricked up the easiest election since 1984, and want that loser to run again.

1 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board