Started By
Message

re: Now that players are getting paid for NIL should they have to pay for tuition ?

Posted on 7/1/21 at 2:01 pm to
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84393 posts
Posted on 7/1/21 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

If schools are going to make these types of changes it’s best to do it now while everything is changing to avoid fighting a negative PR battle later on when you do it after the dust settles and the media paints you as being greedy.



The schools would rightfully be torched in the PR arena if they tried to make the move you suggest. It's an idea only slightly less terrible than OP's. 99.9% of NCAA athletes will see extremely little to zero benefit from NIL.
Posted by RRBengal
Member since Feb 2021
235 posts
Posted on 7/1/21 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

The schools would rightfully be torched in the PR arena if they tried to make the move you suggest. It's an idea only slightly less terrible than OP's. 99.9% of NCAA athletes will see extremely little to zero benefit from NIL.


I don't believe so. Athletes are making demands that they be given the right to make money off of NIL, and also the right to transfer without being forced to sit out a year. Both of which I support.

However, the schools will invest in an individual to help develop them, win, and get them to the next level. That individual can now jump ship to a better team without any financial recuperation for the losing institution. I believe that there should be some mechanism setup that allows for anyone to transfer to anywhere, but makes it less likely due to a buyout clause of some sort.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram