Started By
Message

re: LA legislature denies Independent nurse practice

Posted on 6/22/21 at 7:21 pm to
Posted by SM6
Georgia
Member since Jul 2008
8804 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

CajunDoc


You are more concerned with your market share than you are patient health. The rest of the country has NP and PAs delivering primary care at a range of facilities. Louisiana took the brave stance not to allow that, interesting decision in a state that struggles with 1) a lot of terribly unhealthy people 2) many people unable/unwilling to pay for their own health care.

How much are your association dues? I have to admit, they are paying dividends.
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6501 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 11:24 pm to
quote:


You are more concerned with your market share than you are patient health


his 'market share' will not likely be impacted lmao. patient health will likely be impacted.

quote:

The rest of the country has NP and PAs delivering primary care at a range of facilities. Louisiana took the brave stance not to allow that,

actually the majority of states do not allow independent midlevel practice. most states do require collaborative/supervision contracts.

quote:

1) a lot of terribly unhealthy people 2) many people unable/unwilling to pay for their own health care.

1) is a great reason to not allow midlevel independence as managing a patient population with many and complex medical problems is much more likely outside the scope of midlevel practice and training.
2) if they can't/won't pay for health care your point is moot.
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
28622 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

The rest of the country has NP and PAs delivering primary care at a range of facilities.
quote:

Louisiana took the brave stance not to allow that,

quote:

interesting decision in a state that struggles with 1) a lot of terribly unhealthy people 2) many people unable/unwilling to pay for their own health care.

So you think that terribly unhealthy people, the sickest of the sick, should be cared for by people with less training?

If people can't pay for their healthcare, maybe idk more residency slots could help with this since residents deliver excellent, high-level, supervised care to patients without insurance. After all it's residency slots, not med school, that is the bottle neck, despite the crazy conspiracy theories here about the big bad AMA artificially limiting the doctor pool.
This post was edited on 6/23/21 at 4:43 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram