Started By
Message
locked post

FNM's/FRE's Assets to Be Unwound at 10%/Yr from 2010 On

Posted on 9/7/08 at 1:32 pm
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 1:32 pm
quote:

Oh, it's such a perfect day
I'm glad I spent it with you
Oh, such a perfect day
You just keep me hanging on
You just keep me hanging on


-- Lou Reed's "Perfect Day"


See Hank Paulson's press conference on CNNMoney's homepage: LINK.

Availability of mortgage financing will be "modestly" increased through the end of 2009, and then "to address systemic risk," the GSEs will--beginning in 2010--have their portfolios gradually reduced by 10% per year, largely by natural runoff.

Read what Paulson said here.

Obviously, not a perfect solution, but an important first step, and something that dramatically raises the stakes of this fall's elections in November.
This post was edited on 9/7/08 at 1:38 pm
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 2:30 pm to
Biggest suprise was suspending the dividend on preferred. Those are going to be worth near nothing now, and a ton of medium and small sized banks are going to take huge hits to their asset base because of it. Just shifting money from a treasury bailout to an fdic bailout when some of them ultimately fail.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Just shifting money from a treasury bailout to an fdic bailout when some of them ultimately fail.


Just shifting a fraction of the money. I doubt (1) that most of the preferred stocks are owned by failing banks, (2) that FDIC payments will cover all of these losses, or (3) that enough of these smaller banks will fail to precipitate a larger bailout.
Posted by SantinoClaus
depends on day of the week
Member since Aug 2008
376 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

FNM's/FRE's Assets to Be Unwound at 10%/Yr from 2010 On
Biggest suprise was suspending the dividend on preferred. Those are going to be worth near nothing now, and a ton of medium and small sized banks are going to take huge hits to their asset base because of it. Just shifting money from a treasury bailout to an fdic bailout when some of them ultimately fail.





When the preferred dividends start getting paid again, will all of the unpaid back-dividends start being paid as well?



What happens to the common stock here? Zero? A few cents?


After reading a bit, what I'm getting is that the stock will be worth next to nothing, definitely no more than a buck or two and maybe much less - but that there is a slim chance some other corporation may offer to buy the entire company (fannie or freddie or both) which might push the stock a little higher than that.

Am I getting it about right?

fannie and freddie stock now only bestow the rights of 1) future governing of the company when the government decides its OK, if ever and 2) future profits after all losses are recouped, if ever.

So its basically not even a share of stock really - its the right to own shares of Fannie or Freddie in the future, should they become available.
This post was edited on 9/7/08 at 3:07 pm
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 3:18 pm to
I don't think I've seen anyone suggest someone would offer to buy them, and I find it hard to believe there is a company that has the capital to absorb such losses. The preferreds would rebound upon re-instating the dividend, but they would have to be profitable and out of conservatorship before they even considered that. You're talking about at least five years in the best case scenario, imo. I mean they don't even have to start unwinding till 2010. The bailout probably stops financial Armageddon; it doesn't stop the current crisis from getting significantly worse though.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

When the preferred dividends start getting paid again, will all of the unpaid back-dividends start being paid as well?


Almost certainly not. Preferred stock is an equity-debt hybrid. If equity-like dividends are suspended, then you shouldn't get them back. They are not the same as coupon payments on government Treasuries, although I do admit this is a very blurry area. Still, the debt part is different from the equity part.

quote:

What happens to the common stock here? Zero? A few cents?


Undetermined. There are a million ways that this can be done. Here's one example...

Equity will be used to offset any losses. Perhaps the gov't will loan the GSEs some money, and then make the GSE enter a contract to pay that loan back on favorable terms. In the meantime, the equity owners get no dividends. Starting in 2010, though, they still retain ownership rights to future earnings. However, they will also be placed under new restraints that will draw down the amount of assets the GSEs will be allowed to work with.

quote:

Am I getting it about right?

fannie and freddie stock now only bestow the rights of 1) future governing of the company when the government decides its OK, if ever and 2) future profits after all losses are recouped, if ever.

So its basically not even a share of stock really - its the right to own shares of Fannie or Freddie in the future, should they become available.


Sounds about right. In the best-case scenario, Fannie and Freddie will be broken up into around 8 completely private mortgage corporations around 2010 or 2011, and stockholders will just get ownership interest in those firms. Nothing is for certain, however.
Posted by MileHigh
Most likely a mile high
Member since Jan 2004
7920 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 3:31 pm to
I would prefer for the runoff to start immediately, and lending standards to be tightened for FNM/FRE originated loans.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 3:47 pm to
MileHigh = Herbert Hoover
Posted by MileHigh
Most likely a mile high
Member since Jan 2004
7920 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

MileHigh = Herbert Hoover

Thank god, I am not in charge.
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

I doubt (1) that most of the preferred stocks are owned by failing banks


I think you're wrong. They are very widely held securities - and a big decline in their value could CAUSE bank failures.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 4:31 pm to
Define "most" then.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 5:01 pm to
Here's how I see it Doc. Its not that they are owned by "failing" banks as much as its about them being owned by a lot of banks period. By and large those are believed to be the small and medium sized banks that, as of right now, might be doing okay. However, once they have to write down the value of those preferred shares, their capital base is going to be decreased significantly. Less capital, less loans, less profit. Less capital, more debt or more expensive equity, etc. I'm just saying that the ripple effects of this will be felt throughout the banking sector, and it might end up pushing some banks over the edge (and hence leading to more taxpayer bailoutage through FDIC). Let's just hope enough of them don't fail (whether from GSE-relaed writedowns or not) that the FDIC needs to start borrowing too.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

I'm just saying that the ripple effects of this will be felt throughout the banking sector, and it might end up pushing some banks over the edge


Well, sure, that's fine. But it's not as if bailout money is getting pushed around from one department to another. Only a small fraction of these write-downs will trickle down to FDIC-related payments by the government. I mean, does preferred stock really get the majority of its value from the number of dividend payments expected in the next 16 months? I don't think so.
Posted by Colonel Hapablap
Mostly Harmless
Member since Nov 2003
28791 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

I think you're wrong. They are very widely held securities - and a big decline in their value could CAUSE bank failures.


I will be very curious to see how the market reacts tomorrow. I can't envision any world in which this is good for financials in the near term. But the market hasn't been thinking right for about 18 months either.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

I can't envision any world in which this is good for financials in the near term.


Why not?
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

I mean, does preferred stock really get the majority of its value from the number of dividend payments expected in the next 16 months?


I was under the impression that their current value was still relatively high ($18ish) because it was being propped up by the thought that the preferreds wouldn't lose their dividend. Remove that and it will absolutely fall precipitously.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 5:57 pm to
Here I would think the opposite. I would fully expect a big upside day/week from this, but ultimately the fundamentals still suck for the sector and they will reflect their real value with time.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

Remove that and it will absolutely fall precipitously.


But most of preferred stock's value is derived from being subordinated debt, right? I don't think the Treasury Department is going to elect to wipe out all of the hypothetical liquidation value of these preferred shares.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 6:08 pm to
"With this agreement, Treasury receives senior preferred equity shares and warrants that protect taxpayers. Additionally, under the terms of the agreement, common and preferred shareholders bear losses ahead of the new government senior preferred shares . . . conservatorship does not eliminate the outstanding preferred stock, but does place preferred shareholders second, after the common shareholders, in absorbing losses."

....
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

but does place preferred shareholders second, after the common shareholders, in absorbing losses


which is where they always are
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram