Started By
Message

re: Microsoft SQL Database Management Program found on Dominion... Non-Authorized software

Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:23 pm to
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56796 posts
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

If you google "Microsoft SQL Dominion" you find that information provided to the TX SOS and the CO SOS list MS SQL as a standard component.

CO SOS

TX SOS

Also listed as a component in the US Election Assistance Commission's Certificate of Conformance: LINK

So what's going on?


A SQL Server existing as the primary data repository wouldn't be surprising. The existence of the Management toolset is almost assuredly a violation of the security requirements of the secure environment. The existence of the management tools on a separate machine is would not only be a violation of the security protocol, but also extremely suspicious.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54753 posts
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

The existence of the Management toolset is almost assuredly a violation of the security requirements of the secure environment.


Do you have information that the "Management toolset" was found?
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53514 posts
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

A SQL Server existing as the primary data repository wouldn't be surprising. The existence of the Management toolset is almost assuredly a violation of the security requirements of the secure environment. The existence of the management tools on a separate machine is would not only be a violation of the security protocol, but also extremely suspicious.


Yep. And not on the list in Cwill's link either. There is a reason for that too.
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29318 posts
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

A SQL Server existing as the primary data repository wouldn't be surprising. The existence of the Management toolset is almost assuredly a violation of the security requirements of the secure environment. The existence of the management tools on a separate machine is would not only be a violation of the security protocol, but also extremely suspicious.


OK so now we are talking SSMS...I can buy that there are many servers where SSMS isn't allowed. However, that is called out in the requirements specifically because if not it usually gets installed.

I don't see it specifically called not to install it as a part of MS SQL Server in the docs, but maybe it was a part of the deal. That could be something to look at.

Regardless I think the point here is was the server networked...if not good....if so we have a problem regardless of what software was installed on the machine.
Posted by tgerb8
Huntsvegas
Member since Aug 2007
6003 posts
Posted on 5/10/21 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

The existence of the management tools on a separate machine is would not only be a violation of the security protocol, but also extremely suspicious.


Absolutely. By itself this could be written off as a non issue. The DoD has routine security inspections and tiny settings are scrutinized let alone entire, unnecessary software suites. Either way this, as any unneeded/additional software, is a security vulnerability. That, in itself could be malicious or just an oversight (however it sheds doubt on the entire security audit I would assume these go through before they are deployed). The strange thing is SQL isn't "dig dug" for 2 reasons. It's not free, unlicensed software. And it wasn't installed by a bored admin who forgot to remove it. Both points indicate a reason. What was the reason?
This post was edited on 5/10/21 at 3:57 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram