- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I'm listening to the Court hearing on Democrats's Lawsuit in Arizon to Stop the Audit
Posted on 4/23/21 at 6:00 pm to Wednesday
Posted on 4/23/21 at 6:00 pm to Wednesday
quote:
The unattractive fat lawyer that the Democrats sent said that the audit was being infiltrated with hate groups.
I wonder what Republicans would do if Democrats got an audit ordered and then selected Democratic supporting "auditors" to do the audit.
The Arizona Senate is delusional if they think that this audit is going to settle anything.
The company that will lead the audit is a Florida-based company called Cyber Ninjas, which has no experience in elections or election audits. Cyber Ninjas is led by Doug Logan, who supported several conspiracy theories about the election. In December, he retweeted a post that questioned the validity of Maricopa’s ballot count and falsely said Trump may have gotten 200,000 more votes than were reported in Arizona.
Another main cog of the audit group is J. Hutton Pulitzer (F/K/A J. Jovan Philyaw), the charlatan (the Oak Island sword hoax) who claimed that he had hacked into Dominion servers on his laptop while he was testifying before the Georgia legislature.
Supposedly, the audit is going to include a review of all of the signature matches. Imagine how loud the Republicans would howl if a Democratic sympathetic auditor was the sole arbiter of all the signature matches in an election audit.
By the time the results of the audit are picked apart by real election experts, the results of this audit will be beyond useless.
Posted on 4/23/21 at 6:07 pm to texridder
quote:
I wonder what Republicans would do if Democrats got an audit ordered and then selected Democratic supporting "auditors" to do the audit.
You mean like the time several cities in Wisconsin hired a Democrat operative to supervise counting? Or the time the Democrat governments of urban areas in swing states threw out poll workers? Or the time they hired their family members to count votes after the poll watchers had gone home? Or do you mean the time that the Democrat Secretaries of State unilaterally changed the voting laws to favor Democrats in urban areas but didn’t bother to help out red areas?
I don’t know. I’m not sure how Republicans would act if Democrat operatives rigged a voting scheme behind closed doors. I lack the standing to complain about it.
This post was edited on 4/23/21 at 6:08 pm
Posted on 4/23/21 at 6:11 pm to texridder
Why are the democrats concerned about security? I thought security was racist.
Posted on 4/23/21 at 6:13 pm to texridder
Or maybe you mean the time that the Democrat party paid a Democrat lawyer so it could launder the money it spent to create a dossier about peeing hookers so that it could then turn the information over to the FBI so it could spy on a Presidential campaign?
Or maybe you mean the time that wealthy private companies shut out political advertising for one political party while it gave hundreds of millions of dollars to Democrat city government in Democrat areas to make it easier for Democrats to cheat.
I’m not sure how I would act about that either. Again. No standing to complain.
Why don’t you let me know how it feels to actually be able to locate a forum to air your grievances, or you can even go set something on fire if you’re puddled off but I’m engaging in sedition if I want to complain about it so I wouldnt know and I would love to be enlightened
Or maybe you mean the time that wealthy private companies shut out political advertising for one political party while it gave hundreds of millions of dollars to Democrat city government in Democrat areas to make it easier for Democrats to cheat.
I’m not sure how I would act about that either. Again. No standing to complain.
Why don’t you let me know how it feels to actually be able to locate a forum to air your grievances, or you can even go set something on fire if you’re puddled off but I’m engaging in sedition if I want to complain about it so I wouldnt know and I would love to be enlightened
This post was edited on 4/23/21 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 4/23/21 at 6:14 pm to texridder
quote:
Imagine how loud the Republicans would howl if a Democratic sympathetic auditor was the sole arbiter of all the signature matches in an election audit.
That's nearly every election where signatures are still required, and I'm not talking about the audit, but the count.
quote:
The company that will lead the audit is a Florida-based company called Cyber Ninjas, which has no experience in elections or election audits.
Are they doing something more than verifying signatures and counting? Because if it involves counting, it's best done by a conservative because math is not racist on the Right and we can actually count. Re signature verification, as I understand it a signature that's iffy is flagged and then reviewed by a panel. Everything is done under observation (I think it's even streamed), unlike the double secret counting Leftists are beholden to.
Posted on 4/23/21 at 6:38 pm to texridder
Keep crying. It is fitting for you.
Posted on 4/23/21 at 6:42 pm to texridder
quote:
Supposedly, the audit is going to include a review of all of the signature matches. Imagine how loud the Republicans would howl if a Democratic sympathetic auditor was the sole arbiter of all the signature matches in an election audit.
But no democrat will audit because there was fraud.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)