- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/10/21 at 9:30 pm to tigernnola
quote:
In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does," Meza reasoned. "The homeowner's insurance will reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better."
I hope her house gets broken into everyday for the rest of her life.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 9:37 pm to tigernnola
Okay, the Bee stories are going a little over the top now. I mean, this isn’t even remotely realistic.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 9:39 pm to tigernnola
why doesnt she just give away all her money?
Posted on 4/10/21 at 9:40 pm to Bocephus229
She a virgin, baw. I bet she’s never kissed another person or even flicked her bean.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 10:12 pm to tigernnola
quote:
"I'm not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained. "All I'm saying is that it doesn't warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed."
Meza was quick to reassure that her bill "would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves.
Under the new law the homeowner's obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible, he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner's responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner."
"In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does," Meza reasoned. "The homeowner's insurance will reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better."
lolwut?
Posted on 4/10/21 at 10:19 pm to tigernnola
quote:
Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection
What a coincidence. Same reason I have one
Posted on 4/10/21 at 10:37 pm to tigernnola
Hopefully everyone pays a visit to her house
Posted on 4/10/21 at 10:39 pm to tigernnola
Someone should break into her house and give her a taste of her own medicine.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News