- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Explain to me the new tax increases
Posted on 4/1/21 at 1:39 pm to Jorts R Us
Posted on 4/1/21 at 1:39 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:
First, no one is claiming that offshoring of profits isn't a concern...That's not changing under this proposal. Your concern about repatriation is unfounded.
My goodness, I already admitted I was being glib.
quote:
It's included in the infrastructure bill because they are proposing offsetting some of the costs of the bill with the corporate tax hikes. Whether we agree or disagree, this administration has chosen to very publicly link the two.
Uhm, it is exactly whether we agree or disagree to use this method. They made not effort to link the two at all. Generally there is sense that yes, people or entities will pay higher taxes but they will reap some benefits. This is historically the case with infrastructure bills and fuel taxes. I don't believe (but I could be wrong) that an infrastructure bill has ever been funded by a corporate tax hike. That should give people pause.
They have completely severed this connection. It is now:
Biden Admin "you want infrastructure and I will tax BIG CORPORATIONS to pay for it!"
Populace: "Yay! Stick it to 'em and get me my roads!"
Posted on 4/1/21 at 1:50 pm to BigJim
quote:
My goodness, I already admitted I was being glib.
Sure. Just keeping it clear that repatriation and profit shifting are distinct. I addressed one, your response referenced the other.
quote:
Uhm, it is exactly whether we agree or disagree to use this method. They made not effort to link the two at all.
My point was that they've decided to sell this bill as paid for by corporations and so that is why there are corporate income tax provisions included within it. Not saying I agree but the administration's attempt to link is certainly no secret.
This post was edited on 4/1/21 at 1:52 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News