- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Obese OT posters
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:36 pm to GetCocky11
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:36 pm to GetCocky11
quote:The "normal range" for a 6' person is 136-184 lbs. A 6' 136 lb person is either a tall, skinny chick or a man who was, in fact, just released from a POW camp. 184 is reasonable though, for a puny, 5K weekend warrior type.
"if I weighed what the chart says I should weigh, I'd look like I was just released from a POW Camp"
We can't all have the physique of a skateboarder.
1
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:51 pm to WildManGoose
So why is it that the BMI isn’t as much a problem for some states compared to others? Even if it’s all a bunch of BS for those slimmer states, why is it even more BS for these other fatter states? In same vein, why isn’t as much a problem for those Europeans?
I mean if BMI is complete BS, why isn’t it equally completely BS for everyone? Could it be some places are actually fat as shite?
Here’s the chart in 1990
Are you guys telling me people evolved to be “big boned” or have tree trunk legs in 30 years? Or maybe our diets have drastically changed in those 30 years so the BMI should change like that one guy suggested?
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News