Started By
Message

re: Supreme Court to debate voting rights case that advocates worry will limit access to polls

Posted on 3/1/21 at 12:01 pm to
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 3/1/21 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

With the exception of maybe your standard absentee voting, all voting should be done on one day. You have plenty of fricking time to plan your voting.
I agree that mail-in voting provides far too many opportunities for shenanigans, but I cannot wrap my brain around the opposition to early, in-person voting.

If anything, the poll workers have MORE time to examine your documentation and confirm that you ARE who you SAY you are.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52920 posts
Posted on 3/1/21 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

I cannot wrap my brain around the opposition to early, in-person voting.


I'm opposed to it, if the counting isn't done in the same day as the general electin.

Because the counting done early, often leads to Democrats adjusting the voting outcomes based on how far they are down in the polls. Just like in 2020. If you allow counting to stop, then startup again, you are allowing one side to rig an election. This happens in every 3rd world shithole, and happened in America...TWICE in less than 3 months.
Posted by M. A. Ryland
silver spring, MD
Member since Dec 2005
2051 posts
Posted on 3/1/21 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

but I cannot wrap my brain around the opposition to early, in-person voting.



Early in-person voting should be OK, but you need to have a very limited time; no more than a week.
I don't think it is legit to have people voting in September.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram