- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We, LITERALLY, wuz kangs
Posted on 2/20/21 at 2:28 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
Posted on 2/20/21 at 2:28 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
The whole “we wuz kangz” mentality is so bizarre.
First of all most of the Kangz they reference were Egyptian anyway, or Ethiopian at best, which is East African more than sub-Saharan African.
Basically as different a people as the Magyars were to the Gauls.
And the kings they could possibly, distantly be related to were ones that SOLD the slaves...
But, they weren’t.
They wasn’t kangz. They was soldiers and serfs and slaves
First of all most of the Kangz they reference were Egyptian anyway, or Ethiopian at best, which is East African more than sub-Saharan African.
Basically as different a people as the Magyars were to the Gauls.
And the kings they could possibly, distantly be related to were ones that SOLD the slaves...
But, they weren’t.
They wasn’t kangz. They was soldiers and serfs and slaves
4
Posted on 2/20/21 at 2:31 pm to fr33manator
I can’t imagine giving a frick that someone in history, that I’m not even related to, was some type of royalty - with the only connection being some thin racial bond.
Posted on 2/20/21 at 2:50 pm to fr33manator
quote:
They was soldiers and serfs and slaves
Just as virtually all honkies were, back in the day.
Posted on 2/20/21 at 4:31 pm to fr33manator
Nubia conquered and ruled Egypt at one time. Timbuktu was indeed an academic center of Africa until Morocco shoved its shite in.
But that’s life, and ancient history. No such thing as “back-sies”. These people are deranged.
But that’s life, and ancient history. No such thing as “back-sies”. These people are deranged.
Posted on 2/20/21 at 9:08 pm to fr33manator
quote:
First of all most of the Kangz they reference were Egyptian anyway, or Ethiopian at best, which is East African more than sub-Saharan African.
They weren’t even Egyptian. Black Americans are literally trying to hijack another people’s heritage on this. DNA testing has shown that Egyptians are remarkably unchanged considering the number of times they’ve been ruled by others. The average Egyptian is basically of the same genetic stock as he was 3000 years ago (which is why Egyptians often have a problem being called “Arabs” even though culturally they are... they’re proud of their identity).
There was ONE time that blacks ruled Egypt: the Nubian conquest and the rule of the 25th dynasty. That was 50 years out of a history spanning 3 millennia. And after that period, native Egyptians rose up and drove the Nubians out of the kingdom.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News