Started By
Message

re: Apple taking more shots at Google...

Posted on 2/12/21 at 7:57 pm to
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18651 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

Great, you could say the same about these being features of Google devices, they just allow everyone.


"Allow everyone" in this context means "for free and not tied to a Google device." They can't simultaneously be developed as features solely intended to drive sales of Google devices (like Siri, Maps, etc. are for Apple) and at the same time don't at all need a Google device.

Google Search, Gmail, YouTube, etc. all existed prior to or completely independent of Google's devices anyway. Google didn't buy YouTube to give Pixel users something to watch. They bought it to make money off of advertising.

quote:

Gating their info harvesters doesn't change their intent.


It's not simply "gating," it's a completely different revenue structure which implies different motivations for the direction of their software.

quote:

They don't spend millions developing Safari, etc out of the goodness of their heart to make your privacy better.


No, but they might spend millions developing Safari privacy features to make it a superior product to earn your dollars as 100% of the users they're developing for are paid users.

Google is primarily an advertising company, Apple is primarily a hardware company, neither can be denied and one requires user data exploitation to survive and the other one doesn't. I'm not claiming Apple is the perfect bastion of privacy either, but their company structure doesn't require eviscerating privacy to survive like Google's has been.
This post was edited on 2/12/21 at 8:02 pm
Posted by Fat Batman
Gotham City, NJ
Member since Oct 2019
1397 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 8:10 pm to
Are you saying Safari and all the other free software for iOS devices recoup their development cost from device sales?
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
34112 posts
Posted on 2/12/21 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

Google is primarily an advertising company, Apple is primarily a hardware company, neither can be denied and one requires user data exploitation to survive and the other one doesn'


Exactly. So Apple is forcing Google to move toward their model (which hurts Google) by winning this “privacy” PR battle. Because now Google has to respond to the consumer demand for “privacy”

Apple doesn’t really care, and the benefit to the user is marginal at best. Clearly Apple wants in to the advertising game as well (see Apple Search Ads still being able to device target even if a user opts out)

Getting less targeted ads, woohoo. That just means bigger brands will buy up the ad space because smaller brands won’t be able to hyper target for users anymore
This post was edited on 2/12/21 at 9:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram