Started By
Message

re: Hurricane Gustav

Posted on 8/26/08 at 10:12 am to
Posted by GGASU
Member since Feb 2008
239 posts
Posted on 8/26/08 at 10:12 am to
[/quote]
quote:

If the models were in complete disagreement on Gustav's projected path, you might have a valid point. However, that is not the case here.


From national hurricane center

[quote]THERE REMAINS A LARGE AMOUNT OF SPREAD INTHE MODELS AT 72 HOURS AND BEYOND. THE 00Z UKMET AND ECMWF MODELS
MAINTAIN THE RIDGE OVER THE GULF OF MEXICO...WHICH KEEPS GUSTAVE
MOVING WESTWARD TOWARDS THE YUCATAN PENINSULA. THE
GFDL...HWRF...AND GFS WEAKEN THE RIDGE WHICH ALLOWS FOR A
WEST-NORTHWESTWARD MOTION INTO THE CENTRAL GULF OF MEXICO. THE NEW
NHC TRACK FORECAST LEANS TOWARD THE GFS/HWRF SCENARIO AND IS A
LITTLE TO THE RIGHT OF THE MODEL CONSENSUS.
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 8/26/08 at 10:27 am to
quote:

THERE REMAINS A LARGE AMOUNT OF SPREAD INTHE MODELS AT 72 HOURS AND BEYOND.


PEOPLE! Please read that.. All model suck 72 hours and further out and GFDL is absolutely horrible at long range modeling.. Keep an eye on it but running around claiming the sky is falling is not the answer.



For Global Models..

Long term (4days)
ECMWF
BAMM (non global)

2-3 days out
GFDL
NOGAPS

Outside of 3 days nothing is accurate.. BAMM sucks short term ans ECMWF doesnt have a long track life.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram