- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chyna Joe another nail in the oil industry
Posted on 1/27/21 at 8:16 am to GumboPot
Posted on 1/27/21 at 8:16 am to GumboPot
quote:
What subsidies?
My understanding is he is going after things like MLPs (now wanting to tax the entity and then also the investor's income); depletion allowances, allowances for intangible drilling costs, etc.
Posted on 1/27/21 at 8:21 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
My understanding is he is going after things like MLPs (now wanting to tax the entity and then also the investor's income); depletion allowances, allowances for intangible drilling costs, etc.
That ain't happening under an EO. That is tax law. Congress needs to make those changes. And those legal corporate structures are not subsides. FWIW, those corporate structures were set up to incentivize energy companies to bring reliable energy to consumers. Renewable energy producers can participate in those corporate structures too. It's not limited to just O&G energy providers.
Posted on 1/27/21 at 8:27 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
depletion allowances, allowances for intangible drilling costs, etc.
No way this can be changed by some flimsy executive order. The last president that tried to heavily push this was JFK and see how that worked out. The industry should be allowed to normalize their tax policies on inventory just like any other industry. The playing field should be level and that's essentially what these tax policies were originally put in place for.
This post was edited on 1/27/21 at 8:30 am
Posted on 1/27/21 at 8:37 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
My understanding is he is going after things like MLPs (now wanting to tax the entity and then also the investor's income); depletion allowances, allowances for intangible drilling costs, etc.
Back when America still followed the Constitution, he'd need to work with Congress to change those policies. And Congress used to not like to forfeit these powers to the Executive Branch, but have increasingly done so, making our Constitution moot.
"depletion allowances" are legitimate and proper, since they reflect the decreasing value of the initial investment in buying or leasing land with reserves. There's literally nothing wrong with that - it reflects an economic reality.
Geez. Double taxation of partnerships would also seem to require Congressional action... at least back when the President could not write law.
But frick, the Executive Branch now can extend the lowering of the statutory rates on student loans to 0%, costing taxpayers, without getting Congressional approval. I'd have to dig through the legislation to see if this was yet another Congressional power they abdicated to the Executive Branch in the Muh COVID Relief Bill.
There's a legal concept of what powers can be legally delegated to another branch, but I'm not sure where that fits in here.
This post was edited on 1/27/21 at 8:38 am
Posted on 1/27/21 at 8:52 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
The elimination of the IRS 179 deduction for vehicles over 6k pounds is included in this which means he just really screwed farmers, businesses, and car manufacturers.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News