- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Leahy, not Roberts, to preside over impeachment trial
Posted on 1/25/21 at 5:40 pm to teke184
Posted on 1/25/21 at 5:40 pm to teke184
quote:No. set aside preconceptions and read the words. Look at the tenses. He WAS President when impeached by the House. Procedurally (only), no problem there. He will no longer be President when tried by the Senate. Roberts need not preside. No procedural problem there.
if he was the president when impeached, Robert’s MUST preside over it. And he has refused.
So they aren’t following proper procedure and the whole thing should be tossed.
The only question is whether the trial may proceed after the accused leaves office. As to a former POTUS, that IS an open question, but analogous precedent from the 1800s suggests that the answer is “yes.”
Posted on 1/25/21 at 7:28 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
As to a former POTUS, that IS an open question, but analogous precedent from the 1800s suggests that the answer is “yes.”
I think that hinges on the two available "sentences" that they can hand down. The first being removal from office, and the 2nd barring future office. It's that 2nd possibility that would lead me to think a conviction, if it were to occur, would be upheld.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 7:36 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
AggieHank86
You might be dumber than I thought
Posted on 1/25/21 at 8:04 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
The only question is whether the trial may proceed after the accused leaves office. As to a former POTUS, that IS an open question, but analogous precedent from the 1800s suggests that the answer is “yes.”
Seems like that question will eventually find it's way to Roberts, where he won't be able to duck his duty.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News