I did a little research and couldn’t find a number in the lawsuit only articles from the usual suspects using the 2.5 number. I found one the cited some experts that gave a range of 400mm - 2.5T. The lower is more reasonable when you think about the gross number.

As far as official docs I can only find the appeal from the whistle blower tax court summary judgement ruling...no $$$ figures mentioned.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by WDE24

Member since Oct 2010

54193 posts

Posted on 1/24/21 at 10:54 am to cwill

You are a fool looking for this information in the actual court documents. You have to know the right people on Twitter to follow if you want credible information.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by BoarEd

The Hills

Member since Oct 2015

38862 posts

Posted on 1/24/21 at 10:55 am to cwill

quote:
I did a little research and couldn’t find a number in the lawsuit only articles from the usual suspects using the 2.5 number.

As I said the first time, the number was given to Congress by these two guys during a congressional hearing that was available to everyone in the world to watch. Amazing how you seem to have missed this.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Robin Masters

Birmingham

Member since Jul 2010

30189 posts

Posted on 1/24/21 at 10:59 am to cwill

quote:

I did a little research and couldn’t find a number in the lawsuit only articles from the usual suspects using the 2.5 number. I found one the cited some experts that gave a range of 400mm - 2.5T. The lower is more reasonable when you think about the gross number.

As far as official docs I can only find the appeal from the whistle blower tax court summary judgement ruling...no $$$ figures mentioned.

There’s no evidence this ever occurred.

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board