- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nielsen looking less likely per Jane Slater
Posted on 1/18/21 at 7:10 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
Posted on 1/18/21 at 7:10 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:Are you saying with the language or the disagreement? Because I don't think there is anyway the Saints can "block" this move
And a judge in Louisiana who will likely decide this, will agree.
2
Posted on 1/18/21 at 7:18 pm to El Magnifico
Didn't LSU allow the saints to use Tiger Stadium after Katrina did a number on the Superdome?
Seems like raising a ruckus about a DL coach moving up to DC at LSU wouldn't be a very neighborly way to return that deed.
Seems like raising a ruckus about a DL coach moving up to DC at LSU wouldn't be a very neighborly way to return that deed.
Posted on 1/18/21 at 7:21 pm to El Magnifico
quote:
Are you saying with the language or the disagreement? Because I don't think there is anyway the Saints can "block" this move
I'm saying the move CANNOT be blocked. It was posited that this was a non-compete, in that instance, the language is probably unenforceable. If there ar specific contract terms, They will have to litigate to collect.
Most likely is that he is negotiating to try to get LSU to pay any buyout terms. What will likely happen is that LSU will pay for legal fees and try to win in court or negotiate a reduced buyout, if they want him, which apparently they do.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News