Sure. I’ll keep adding for a few days until we all get tired of it. Let’s start at the beginning, with a simple one where we should be able to agree on the facts:

SCANDAL #1: Trump hired his daughter and son-in-law to work in the White House, and gave them serious policy responsibility for which they were unqualified.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by bfniii

Member since Nov 2005

17840 posts

Posted on 1/11/21 at 11:53 am to LightHeat

quote:
SCANDAL #1: Trump hired his daughter and son-in-law to work in the White House, and gave them serious policy responsibility for which they were unqualified

translated: (in skyscream voice) trump didn't hire inside the beltway like biden did. RREEEEEEE

The whole point of the Trump administration, the reason why his supporters voted for him was to do exactly what you are criticizing him of - break the precedent of political establishment. Get outside of the beltway. Get people who were not financially obligated and beholden to anyone. You apparently missed that whole dynamic.

You're off to a rousing start with your "list." I think we can cross #1 off

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by frogtown

Member since Aug 2017

5064 posts

Posted on 1/11/21 at 2:48 pm to LightHeat

quote:
SCANDAL #1: Trump hired his daughter and son-in-law to work in the White House, and gave them serious policy responsibility for which they were unqualified.

This is not corruption. About ten other Presidents have hired their sons and daughters and son-in-laws etc to work in their administration. Why was it legal for FDR and Eisenhower to hire their kids and not Trump? Answer that.

As for Ivanka and Jared Kushner being "unqualified" again that is crap. Jared has gotten more accomplished in the Middle East then anybody member of the US Govt in the last 30 years.

This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 3:06 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by gthog61

Irving, TX

Member since Nov 2009

71001 posts

Posted on 1/12/21 at 5:15 am to LightHeat

quote:
SCANDAL #1: Trump hired his daughter and son-in-law to work in the White House, and gave them serious policy responsibility for which they were unqualified.

You stupid frick, the son in law who did more than anyone else ever regarding your precious "Middle East peace"?

Compare what he did to what anybody working for Obama did.

This is why there is no point discussing anything with you people - you are delusional from the jump.

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board