- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: B1G rejects Nebraska's bid to add Chattanooga to replace Wisconsin game this weekend
Posted on 10/29/20 at 10:38 am to Packer
Posted on 10/29/20 at 10:38 am to Packer
I misread your first post. The B1G rules are ridiculous, they basically set up the schools to fail by not putting in any bye weeks. You can do all the testing in the world, but there will be outbreaks. Why the B1G won’t allow teams to schedule other games makes zero sense
Posted on 10/29/20 at 1:02 pm to ClampClampington
quote:
The B1G rules are ridiculous, they basically set up the schools to fail by not putting in any bye weeks
That was the point. The majority of the Big 10 presidents didn't want to play. They reluctantly agreed to do so as the public pressure against them (from fans and, more notably, the players themselves) mounted. In doing so they made sure the "precautionary rules" would bring about a de facto shut down unless virtually nobody tested positive for covid (which wasn't going to happen). That way, they could appease the "angry mob" by playing, but ultimately get their preferred result of no games through the impracticality of the rules. They made their real goal pretty obvious when they enacted (among other things) the 21 day quarantine
Can't play games if you don't have available players
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News