- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

ESPNU 150 IS OUT!!!
Posted on 8/6/08 at 10:59 am
Posted on 8/6/08 at 10:59 am
LSU IS DOMINATING!!
Posted on 8/6/08 at 11:01 am to jac1280
Can you link it and request a sticky?
ETA:
Link to ESPN 150
ETA:
Link to ESPN 150
This post was edited on 8/6/08 at 11:03 am
Posted on 8/6/08 at 11:01 am to Stagg8
im not sure how to do all that....sorry
Posted on 8/6/08 at 11:07 am to jac1280
Stavion Lowe - 29
Davenport - 54
J Mac - 49
Josh Downs - 81

Davenport - 54
J Mac - 49
Josh Downs - 81
This post was edited on 8/6/08 at 11:10 am
Posted on 8/6/08 at 11:16 am to jac1280
the 3 schools w/ the longest streak ranked in the AP all have 9 0f the top 150 (LSU,tx, usc)
Posted on 8/6/08 at 11:17 am to Brown Mountain
Horrible list.
I bleed P&G but to think that LSUs class is on par with USC's at this point is ludicrous. (Both USC and LSU have the same number of prospects in the ESPN150).
It's the worst rankings I have seen this year by far. Take it with a grain of salt...
ETA: I don't want to fire any of you up on the USC comment, but AT THIS POINT, USC's class is much better than ANYONE else's in the country. If LSU finishes as strong as everyone thinks, THEN they are comparable.
I bleed P&G but to think that LSUs class is on par with USC's at this point is ludicrous. (Both USC and LSU have the same number of prospects in the ESPN150).
It's the worst rankings I have seen this year by far. Take it with a grain of salt...
ETA: I don't want to fire any of you up on the USC comment, but AT THIS POINT, USC's class is much better than ANYONE else's in the country. If LSU finishes as strong as everyone thinks, THEN they are comparable.
This post was edited on 8/6/08 at 11:18 am
Posted on 8/6/08 at 11:17 am to Brown Mountain
quote:
ESPNU 150 IS OUT!!!
Stavion Lowe - 29
Davenport - 54
J Mac - 49
Josh Downs - 81
+ Loston, RR, and others........no need to
Posted on 8/6/08 at 11:20 am to lsusteve1
quote:
no need to
Just saying its a way different look than the other recruiting sites. And a look im having trouble aggreeing winth.
Posted on 8/6/08 at 11:22 am to Brown Mountain
According to this, we aren't even in Debose's top 5.
Posted on 8/6/08 at 11:25 am to lynxcat
quote:
I don't want to fire any of you up on the USC comment, but AT THIS POINT, USC's class is much better than ANYONE else's in the country. If LSU finishes as strong as everyone thinks, THEN they are comparable.
And even THEN, we're still not really that comparable. We can get Loston, Randle and McFarland and they'll still have our class beat because they will have signed the same (or more) 5-star guys and the rest will likely be 4-stars.
Posted on 8/6/08 at 11:52 am to thunderbird1100
Some of the differences between ESPN 150 and rivals is just ridiculous, Mcfarland at 2 vs. 49?? I wish there was more consistancy
Posted on 8/6/08 at 11:54 am to BayouBengal10
quote:
Some of the differences between ESPN 150 and rivals is just ridiculous, Mcfarland at 2 vs. 49?? I wish there was more consistancy
A lot of the discrepencies have to be manufactured. If ESPN came out with a top 150 that looked like Rivals (or Scout for that matter), what would be the point? They would basically be perpetuating the image that they're useless.
Posted on 8/6/08 at 11:54 am to BayouBengal10
Rivals fricked up Loston with him being in the 20's
ESPN is right in where they decidided to put loston
ESPN is right in where they decidided to put loston
Posted on 8/6/08 at 12:14 pm to Stagg8
This is a link to the LSU commits as per ESPN...it shows all commits plus if the are in the ESPN 150.
LINK
I am most critical of Chris Davenport being ranked as the #5 DT, Faulk as the #66 OT, & Kenny Bell as the #47 WR.
Linx: I disagree with USC being better...there is a bias toward west coast guy because they are easier to evaluate because there are a lot more talent evaluators per capita in CA than the SE...that's my opinion...

LINK
I am most critical of Chris Davenport being ranked as the #5 DT, Faulk as the #66 OT, & Kenny Bell as the #47 WR.
Linx: I disagree with USC being better...there is a bias toward west coast guy because they are easier to evaluate because there are a lot more talent evaluators per capita in CA than the SE...that's my opinion...
Posted on 8/6/08 at 9:28 pm to Catahoula Lake LA
Did you see that Ray Ray Armstrong was ranked ahead of Andre Debose. I live in the next city over from them. My cowoker played with them last year at seminole High; he claims that Armstrong is all around a better athlete then Debose which is saying a lot as some of you know. He just wasn't in the lime light, because seminole runs the option and Ray Ray is their QB. So he would just hand off to Debose and the other backs.He wasn't able to spend as much time as needed on defense. My coworker claims Ray Ray has the qualities to be one the best LB's In this class judging his Size and Instincts that he possess.
Posted on 8/6/08 at 9:33 pm to thunderbird1100
And they seem to do less with "more" talent. 
Posted on 8/6/08 at 9:44 pm to lynxcat
quote:As good as LSU's class has been, it's no where near USC's as of now. LSU definitely has the capability of finishing on par with USC though.
I bleed P&G but to think that LSUs class is on par with USC's at this point is ludicrous. (Both USC and LSU have the same number of prospects in the ESPN150).
Posted on 8/6/08 at 9:47 pm to Louie T
quote:
And they seem to do less with "more" talent.
+1
Posted on 8/6/08 at 9:48 pm to Tigerark
And here come the anti-USC flamers...
Popular
Back to top

4





