Started By
Message

re: With all the trade talk on here and FB groups.Shouldnt finding the head coach come first?

Posted on 9/21/20 at 4:07 pm to
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
3616 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 4:07 pm to
Once again..from the view of our FO that 26 million going forward is more valuable. It doesn't necessarily mean a player this year. You have to look at players we can get the next few years. We can't do that if we are stuck with Wiggins for several years. Do you not see that? It isn't even about landing that guy or any specific person this year. Its about having the FLEXIBILITY. If you lock up Wiggins you don't have that and are stuck with your core no matter how good/ bad they play. 100% Lonzo or JJ or both will be gone and we aren't going into the tax yet.
This post was edited on 9/21/20 at 4:10 pm
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
3616 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 4:13 pm to
I've said several times we trade JJ for role players and we trade Lonzo for a pick or role player. Then we can actually test those players out with Jrue and our core. From there we have more valuable future assets from JJ/ Lonzo AND still have Jrue to keep, trade, or let walk.

You want to trade our most valuable asset for someone of less value and be stuck with those results for several years. That's not the way you do it man and our FO knows that.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25795 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 5:34 pm to
quote:


Once again..from the view of our FO that 26 million going forward is more valuable.


That’s a stupid point of view imo.
Give me a realistic FA pickup with that money.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram