- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sports Teams Tax Subsidies
Posted on 9/10/20 at 8:15 am to MsState of mind
Posted on 9/10/20 at 8:15 am to MsState of mind
quote:
why are taxpayers still footing the bill for their stadiums and direct payments
I'm gonna get pretty far out here on a limb and say because the economic benefits are way more than the cost.
Pretty high level stuff, here.
Posted on 9/10/20 at 8:17 am to Barstools
quote:The proponents, fans ect. ALWAYS spout this bullshite but numbers are never presented to back up the claim. You got numbers?
I'm gonna get pretty far out here on a limb and say because the economic benefits are way more than the cost.
La politicians used the same "logic" with the La. film tax credit deal, even after it was proven a net cost to tax payers.
Folks complain constantly about WIC and EBT, etc. while the Bensons rake in millions from LA taxpayers - the wealthiest woman in the state.
This post was edited on 9/10/20 at 8:21 am
Posted on 9/10/20 at 8:18 am to Barstools
quote:
I'm gonna get pretty far out here on a limb and say because the economic benefits are way more than the cost.
Nope.
Posted on 9/10/20 at 8:50 am to Barstools
quote:With declining interest in SJW/ProgLeft pro and college sports, maybe “used to be” is the more correct response?
the economic benefits used to be way more than the cost.
Posted on 9/10/20 at 9:15 am to Barstools
Posted on 9/10/20 at 9:42 am to Barstools
quote:
I'm gonna get pretty far out here on a limb and say because the economic benefits are way more than the cost.
I don't think this actually true. I think that billionaires tend to get their way on this because billionaires tend to get their way on everything.
Posted on 9/10/20 at 10:09 am to Barstools
quote:
I'm gonna get pretty far out here on a limb and say because the economic benefits are way more than the cost.
They are not Too Big to Fail
Posted on 9/10/20 at 10:33 am to Barstools
quote:
I'm gonna get pretty far out here on a limb and say because the economic benefits are way more than the cost.
When you have people upset about all this and not going to games, eating at restaurants, staying in hotels, buy souvenirs.
This mess is effecting innocent people that aren't even involved.. and may or may not agree with Police Brutality.
It usually costs me 2 or 3K to come down to a game and I try to make two a year... Plus I bring friends.
No more.. so that's 6K from one person not going into the Louisiana Economy.
Posted on 9/10/20 at 10:42 am to Barstools
quote:
I'm gonna get pretty far out here on a limb and say because the economic benefits are way more than the cost.
I don't know how I feel about it. There are studies that come down on both sides. I do know for a fact that when Nats Park was built it turned a more seedy part of town into an area with nice apartments with several high profile defense contractors putting offices in the area (I think it's BAE and/or Lockheed but I can't recall.)
In fact, Nats Park did such a job in turning the neighborhood around that it is now accused of playing a significant role in the gentrification of the neighborhood it's in and in the city in general.
(This is an Undefeated article, don't click if you don't want LINK)
This post was edited on 9/10/20 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 9/10/20 at 11:04 am to Barstools
quote:
I'm gonna get pretty far out here on a limb and say because the economic benefits are way more than the cost.
What economic benefits when there aren't butts in the stands?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News