Started By
Message

re: State of affairs

Posted on 8/19/20 at 11:46 am to
Posted by VolTiger13
New Orleans, La
Member since Jul 2017
3884 posts
Posted on 8/19/20 at 11:46 am to
Yeah, but we don’t go under center so that’s doesn’t natter. Fact if the matter is fields is a far and away better athlete than MB. MB is a better passer. Fact if the matter is as a coach in college, you mold your offense to your players strengths, or else you won’t have a job long. So saying he’s not a good fit may be true in the Joe Burrow offense, but that would be a completely different playbook for any new QB however it’s still under the same concepts.
Posted by HighSpark
Member since Feb 2015
113 posts
Posted on 8/19/20 at 1:25 pm to
My point was that the OSU offense does both well, and Fields is a versatile player and would be a fine fit for LSU’s new RPO+ offense. He also played very aware and knew when to run, like Burrow.

I’m also completely on board with Brennan, he deserves his shot.

(and Fields threw for 70% and was top 3 in TDs and passer rating last year. To say Brennan is a better passer before he’s played a meaningful snap is pretty high praise.)
Posted by LifeAquatic
Member since Dec 2019
1811 posts
Posted on 8/20/20 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Fact if the matter is fields is a far and away better athlete than MB. MB is a better passer.



I'm highly optimistic for Brennan this upcoming season, but I don't think there's any way that you can peg Brennan as a better passer than Fields. Fields threw for 3200 yards and 41 TDs on 9.2yds/att last year. That would be an absolutely OUTSTANDING outcome for brennan. In all likelihood, Brennan won't match fields in terms of passing--even if he has a good season.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram