- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/11/20 at 8:56 am to Weaglehey
Judge Patricia Millett speaking now
Posted on 8/11/20 at 8:57 am to Weaglehey
I believe they're going to overturn the 3-judge panel but transfer the case to another judge due to bias. Judge Sullivan should be tarred and feathered.
Posted on 8/11/20 at 8:58 am to SCLibertarian
Sounds like a dem judge being an idiot
Posted on 8/11/20 at 8:58 am to cajunangelle
It is the process that Judge Sullivan has created that is unconstitutional. She has been hammering that point.
However, the technicality is discretion.
Mandamus cannot lie unless it is a ministerial act- no discretion. SP's point is that the constitution is what gives district court discretion but only to ensure that the dismissal is with prejudice to protect the defendant's rights.
Now this judge is looking for an out on the record.
However, the technicality is discretion.
Mandamus cannot lie unless it is a ministerial act- no discretion. SP's point is that the constitution is what gives district court discretion but only to ensure that the dismissal is with prejudice to protect the defendant's rights.
Now this judge is looking for an out on the record.
Posted on 8/11/20 at 8:58 am to GumboPot
Millet is testifying under the premise of yes/no
She is about to start reclaiming her time![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
She is about to start reclaiming her time
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 8/11/20 at 8:59 am to Weaglehey
This Judge Patricia is talking over Sidney and very confused.
Posted on 8/11/20 at 8:59 am to Bamafan24
Im expecting the judge to "reclaim her time" any minute now.
Posted on 8/11/20 at 8:59 am to SlowFlowPro
Exactly what I thought. ![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:00 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
I believe they're going to overturn the 3-judge panel but transfer the case to another judge due to bias. Judge Sullivan should be tarred and feathered.
The entire judicial cabal is trying to run the clock out past the election. Flynn is ultimately going to get off. There is no doubt. But it's about timing. These crooks are tying to get this past the election and are searching for ANY technicality to run the clock out.
Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:01 am to cajunangelle
quote:
This Judge Patricia is talking over Sidney and very confused.
I am not listening, but I am willing to bet that Sidney Powell is miles past this women in intellect.
Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:01 am to GumboPot
Thanks I thought she was a democrat.
She keeps talking over Sidney; after Sidney tries to answer her retarded convoluted questions.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:01 am to cajunangelle
Asking yes/no questions isn't really typical appellate behavior for oral arguments. Usually you're having the attorneys explain arguments, not attempting gotchas. Gotchas are reserved for Congressional testimony and news outlets.
Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:02 am to cajunangelle
What are they trying to keep Flynn from speaking about. That's the whole point of this farce of a case?
Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:04 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Thanks I thought she was a democrat. She keeps talking over Sidney; after Sidney tries to answer her retarded convoluted questions.
:Yep.....17 unbiased judges against Sidney Powell,
sounds fair to me.
Rotten bastids.
Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:05 am to Weaglehey
quote:
What are they trying to keep Flynn from speaking about. That's the whole point of this farce of a case?
NSA audits. Some believe (myself included) that the Obama administration was illegally spying on other 2016 candidates (Paul and Cruz specifically). Some think the NSA is being used to effectuate insider trading by the political elite.
This post was edited on 8/11/20 at 9:06 am
Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:05 am to GumboPot
It is sad that by just audio only it is easy to peg Obama judges.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)