Started By
Message

re: Federal agents heading to Memphis, St. Louis to help address surge in violent crime

Posted on 8/7/20 at 8:02 am to
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
18928 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 8:02 am to
They have been doing this for years under a variety of names “Operation Exile”, “Operation Cease Fire”. They had this program in NOLA for years and it worked. But liberals, as much as they want crime to fall under their administration, hate the concept.

It goes like this. Locals arrest a felon with a gun, bring him to station, federal agents charge him on the spot federally, they move for No Bond based on “danger to community” and subject is tried, convicted and shipped out of state to a federal penetientary within months. The fact that he never hits the streets again after the initial arrest and the quick trial and sentencing means that crime quickly falls. All the politicians take a bow, feds leave, new generation of criminals takes over, cycle repeats.

But these programs 100% prove that the vast majority of crime is committed by a very small part of the community. But, much like our foreign military adventures, no one knows how to follow through after solving the immediate problem. So it just repeats itself. I know I don’t know the answer but we should be jailing these fricks until someone figures it out.

Can’t have people out robbing raping killing and social workers aren t going to stop them.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28712 posts
Posted on 8/7/20 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

The fact that he never hits the streets again after the initial arrest and the quick trial and sentencing means that crime quickly falls. All the politicians take a bow, feds leave, new generation of criminals takes over, cycle repeats.
This is intentional. What else should we expect when there are so many fatherless homes because they're all locked up? The problem with these programs is a lot of them were arrested for non-violent drug charges, but they tack on these gun offenses just because they had one, on the basis that these people were potentially a violent threat. And then when/if they get out, their job prospects are limited due to their record, but they've made a whole lot of great new friends and picked up some great new skills.
quote:

But these programs 100% prove that the vast majority of crime is committed by a very small part of the community.
Right, the poor. Things would be so much better if we could just get rid of the poors!
quote:

no one knows how to follow through after solving the immediate problem. So it just repeats itself. I know I don’t know the answer but we should be jailing these fricks until someone figures it out.
We should definitely continue jailing the actually violent people, but we should probably stop jailing the non-violent ones, at least not for such long sentences on trumped-up gun charges when they didn't even use the gun. Because doing so guarantees the loss of any potential productivity and the possibility of building family wealth to break the cycle of crime. Spare me the "they would never amount to anything anyway" because most people have potential given the right guidance.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram