- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 7/7/20 at 5:01 pm to VolTiger13
quote:
for 1 recruit they have the backing to go up against anyone in the country
Facts.
No, they don't have LSU's facilities, fanbase, success, etc. But, given what they have to work with and their recent rise to relatively moderate success along with the ability to put kids in the league--couple that with the money to compete with any program in the country (ESPECIALLY for DFW kids)...don't count them out.
Posted on 7/7/20 at 5:47 pm to VolTiger13
Not intending to reply to any one poster, but to all that say SMU can rise up and compete for any one or few recruits they want...and this is no knock on Byrd...but if that's the case, why would they shoot their wad on an OT? Why not a QB, RB, or DL that can better raise up the program? It's unlikely if not rare that an OT can do that. Bang for the buck, so to speak.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News