- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS Rules 9-0 States Can Bind Faithless Electors
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:20 am to CU_Tigers4life
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:20 am to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
Big win for the Electoral College!
Also a win for those pushing the popular vote compact. An elector can now be compelled, under pain of penalty, to vote for someone who doesn't win their state.
A state legislature can now basically compel electors to vote for whoever the legislature wants.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:30 am to FalseProphet
quote:
Also a win for those pushing the popular vote compact. An elector can now be compelled, under pain of penalty, to vote for someone who doesn't win their state.
A state legislature can now basically compel electors to vote for whoever the legislature wants.
Not really
quote:
The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states can penalize presidential electors that go rogue and do not vote for the candidate who won their state, also known as faithless electors.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:36 am to FalseProphet
quote:
A state legislature can now basically compel electors to vote for whoever the legislature wants.
I believe faithless electors are strictly defined as those not voting for the candidate that won the state. Therefore this ruling would prevent that. It has to go for the candidate that won the state.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:49 am to FalseProphet
quote:
Also a win for those pushing the popular vote compact. An elector can now be compelled, under pain of penalty, to vote for someone who doesn't win their state.
No.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 10:07 am to FalseProphet
quote:
Also a win for those pushing the popular vote compact. An elector can now be compelled, under pain of penalty, to vote for someone who doesn't win their state.
A state legislature can now basically compel electors to vote for whoever the legislature wants.
No this isn't what the ruling means at all. You are confused.
Posted on 7/6/20 at 11:24 am to FalseProphet
quote:
An elector can now be compelled, under pain of penalty, to vote for someone who doesn't win their state.
I am not sure about that.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News