Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS Rules 9-0 States Can Bind Faithless Electors

Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:20 am to
Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11707 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Big win for the Electoral College!


Also a win for those pushing the popular vote compact. An elector can now be compelled, under pain of penalty, to vote for someone who doesn't win their state.

A state legislature can now basically compel electors to vote for whoever the legislature wants.

Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
21317 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Also a win for those pushing the popular vote compact. An elector can now be compelled, under pain of penalty, to vote for someone who doesn't win their state.

A state legislature can now basically compel electors to vote for whoever the legislature wants.


Not really

quote:

The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states can penalize presidential electors that go rogue and do not vote for the candidate who won their state, also known as faithless electors.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
18097 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:36 am to
quote:

A state legislature can now basically compel electors to vote for whoever the legislature wants.


I believe faithless electors are strictly defined as those not voting for the candidate that won the state. Therefore this ruling would prevent that. It has to go for the candidate that won the state.
Posted by DeusVultMachina
Member since Jul 2017
4245 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Also a win for those pushing the popular vote compact. An elector can now be compelled, under pain of penalty, to vote for someone who doesn't win their state.



No.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
49092 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Also a win for those pushing the popular vote compact. An elector can now be compelled, under pain of penalty, to vote for someone who doesn't win their state.

A state legislature can now basically compel electors to vote for whoever the legislature wants.



No this isn't what the ruling means at all. You are confused.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26701 posts
Posted on 7/6/20 at 11:24 am to
quote:

An elector can now be compelled, under pain of penalty, to vote for someone who doesn't win their state.


I am not sure about that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram