Started By
Message

re: This is why Fauci pushed Remdesivir

Posted on 6/29/20 at 3:00 pm to
Posted by longwayfromLA
NYC
Member since Nov 2007
3331 posts
Posted on 6/29/20 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

And that is with private insurance. No wonder they dont want the cheap hydroxychloroquine to work


To be fair, one of them works and the other one definitely doesn't so there's that. Anyhow, $3,120 as a non-negotiated charge before the payers' discount is not so bad or rather it could be much worse.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19717 posts
Posted on 6/29/20 at 3:10 pm to
A Tale of Two Drugs: Money vs. Medical Wisdom; Hydroxychloroquine and Remdesivir

Elizabeth Lee Vliet, M.D.

quote:

In decades of widespread use, HCQ has an impressive safety record. Irregular heart rhythm or damage to the retina occur rarely, usually with high doses used long term. FDA shows only 62 cardiac deaths attributed to HCQ out of more than 50 million prescriptions, or 0.000124 percent (1.2 out of each 1 million Rx). Rheumatology guidelines for lupus and rheumatoid arthritis do not even require baseline electrocardiograms before prescribing HCQ, since the risk is minimal.


quote:

Early results of the first clinical trial of remdesivir against placebo in coronavirus were announced at the White House Apr 30, and showed modest benefits, according to The New York Times. Surviving patients given remdesivir were discharged 4 days sooner than patients given placebo, though no criteria were given for determining improvement. Death rates were not significantly different. About 25 percent of patients receiving remdesivir had potentially severe side effects, including multiple organ dysfunction, septic shock, acute kidney injury, and low blood pressure. Another 23% showed evidence on lab tests of liver damage.


quote:

The leading communicable disease specialist in France, Professor Didier Raoult, asked about another odd aspect of the remdesivir trial: “Could Anthony Fauci explain why the investigators of the NIAID remdesivir trial did change the primary outcome during the course of the project?” Death as the primary outcome was moved to a secondary outcome, and days to recovery became the primary trial outcome. Changing the primary outcome before trial results are completed is highly unusual and suggests “p-hacking”—manipulating the data to get a statistically significant “p value.


quote:

In contrast, the multi-country compilation of evidence on HCQ and azithromycin in treatment of COVID-19 (updated Apr 27, 2020) has consistently shown that these older medicines prevent infections, significantly reduce severity of illness, reduce viral load and duration of infectivity, reduce number of hospitalizations, reduce ventilator use, and markedly reduce deaths. The data is far beyond “anecodotal,” as Dr. Fauci dismissively called it.


LINK
This post was edited on 6/29/20 at 3:11 pm
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29723 posts
Posted on 6/29/20 at 4:06 pm to
HCQ absolutely works for most people

quit lying
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79360 posts
Posted on 6/30/20 at 7:35 am to
quote:

To be fair, one of them works and the other one definitely doesn't so there's that. Anyhow, $3,120 as a non-negotiated charge before the payers' discount is not so bad or rather it could be much worse.


Then please explain how my good friend, CV+, is on the mend with a HCQ/Az cocktail. Must be an odd coincidence.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram