- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Justice Roberts sides with liberals.....again
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:07 am to Choctaw
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:07 am to Choctaw
I'm not shocked by this. Like I've said before, Roberts cares deeply about things like the reputation of the Court, balance on the Court, and stare decisis. With the Hellerstedt case (which struck down a similar Texas law) having been decided just a few years ago, I am not surprised that he followed it here.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:38 am to Roll Tide Ravens
quote:
Roberts cares deeply about things like the reputation of the Court, balance on the Court, and stare decisis. With the Hellerstedt case
Bullsh!t. I believe it's a combination of Odumbf*ck's spying paying dividends with Roberts and Roberts deep seated hatred of all things Trump.
Notice that Roberts came out F*CKING PUBLICLY to excoriate Trump for referring to liberal/Democrat v. conservative/Republican judges. But, he didn't say a F*CKING WORD when Ruthie the Scumbag was out on the campaign trail saying vile things about Trump.
Another problem with this "stare decisis" bullsh!t is that Roberts says in his concurring opinion that he still sticks by HIS earlier opinion that the law is perfectly valid from a Constitutional standpoint. He hasn't changed HIS position -- a position HE wrote in a dissent. So, basically he's saying that Louisiana's law is perfectly Constitutional but he's going to vote to strike it down. If it was something that involved a close call or something that a Justice ruled on years ago that the public has come to rely on, that's one thing. To blatantly strike down a Constitutional law for the sake of "the reputation of the court, balance of the Court, and stare decisis" is pure f*cking IGNORANCE. If anything his latest opinions have done nothing but tarnish the opinion of the Court and makes him look like someone who has been CLEARLY F*CKING COMPROMISED.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News