Started By
Message

re: Diving deeper on Standard Lithium?

Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:00 pm to
Posted by ev247
Member since Nov 2022
331 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 3:00 pm to
It's too bad that Lanxess has dibs on the lithium from the Lanxess project. Otherwise we might have had a nice Tesla/Ford/GM offtake PR by now.

Man, it sounds like the SWA offtake is also spoken for by Koch Minterals & Trading.

I guess all we have left are these upcoming reports and construction and possible expansion?
Posted by bet84
Texas
Member since Jul 2021
103 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 4:12 pm to
I believe the question of the moment is what process is Exxon and Tetra going to use to extract the lithium from their bromine?

SLI has been testing both their own LISTR process and Koch's LiPro process. I believe the agreement with Koch provides SLI with exclusive rights to use the Li-Pro process in the Smackover Formation (if it turns out better than the LISTR process), which I think covers the Exxon and Tetra mineral properties along with SLI's East Texas mineral properties.

So if Lanxess takes the offtake from their projects, Koch takes the offtake from the SW Ark project, and IF SLI gets the contract to extract the lithium for the Exxon/Tetra mineral properties with Tesla and Ford taking the offtake.... then that would be good news in my opinion. Just hopeful speculation at this point.

Does anyone have any info regarding which extraction process Exxon and Tetra plan to use?

Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19669 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 4:19 pm to
I wonder if it is too late to start building a Tetra position? I have one but it's miniscule compared to SLI position.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram