Started By
Message

re: The fricking organization needs to stand behind Drew.

Posted on 6/3/20 at 9:01 pm to
Posted by Bear Is Dead
Monroe
Member since Nov 2007
4696 posts
Posted on 6/3/20 at 9:01 pm to
Do you honestly believe if the saints and/or Brees gives $10mil to whatever organization they choose, they won’t totally move on from his statement?
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
73707 posts
Posted on 6/3/20 at 9:10 pm to
kneel on ur own fricking time. NFL PRIVILEGED DIPSHITS

SHOW ME UR OUTRAGE FOR all the other metrics and facts that have been laid out. HYPOCRITES.

Posted by BlacknGold
He Hate Me
Member since Mar 2009
12059 posts
Posted on 6/3/20 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

I've linked you this MSU study that disputes the media narrative in another thread.


That entire article says multiple times there's not enough data to really support his claims and the new data collection started in 2019 will help more.

The study is also not aimed at who is getting shot (no pun intended) but more about the cop. I'm not even sure what this one study is really getting at. It draws from so many variables and even admits to leaving out shootings where people were unarmed.
Posted by TigerNlc
Chocolate City
Member since Jun 2006
32552 posts
Posted on 6/3/20 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

was that no one should ever kneel, no matter what the circumstances. Completely ignoring what is happening to his teammates' community. Maybe instead of puffing his chest in an interview, he should talk to those teammates (like many of you keep complaining about) and ask why they feel this way. If he supported their cause he wouldnt condemn their form of protest.

Puffing his chest is stating his opinion
Maybe Michael Thomas should stop puffing his chest. Drew never said he disagreed with their cause just the form of protest. I guess he’s not allowed to have an opinion.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68683 posts
Posted on 6/3/20 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

and even admits to leaving out shootings where people were unarmed
It did not do this at all. It included them but noted that they WERE SO RARE that conclusions couldn't be drawn.

quote:

That entire article says multiple times there's not enough data to really support his claims
Wrong again. It says that his conclusions are supported for general officer shootings of civilians. The study can't provide conclusions when you break the shootings down into different categories having nothing to do with race, because they are too few shootings of each type.

Read it again
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram